2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.054601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online storage ring optimization using dimension-reduction and genetic algorithms

Abstract: Particle storage rings are a rich application domain for online optimization algorithms. The Cornell Electron Storage Ring (CESR) has hundreds of independently powered magnets, making it a high-dimensional test-problem for algorithmic tuning. We investigate algorithms that restrict the search space to a small number of linear combinations of parameters ("knobs") which contain most of the effect on our chosen objective (the vertical emittance), thus enabling efficient tuning. We report experimental tests at CES… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is there left to do? In previous reviews and papers, we have explored and speculated about applications of information geometry to systems biology [71], power systems [23], robustness and neutral spaces in biology [1], controlling and optimizing complex instruments such as particle accelerators [72], and explaining why science works [7]. Here we focus on possible future developments related to the new tools and methods discussed here -understanding why hyperribbons and emergence arise, using their boundaries as simpler models, relations to emergence in physics, new Bayesian priors, and visualization methods that bypass the curse of dimensionality.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is there left to do? In previous reviews and papers, we have explored and speculated about applications of information geometry to systems biology [71], power systems [23], robustness and neutral spaces in biology [1], controlling and optimizing complex instruments such as particle accelerators [72], and explaining why science works [7]. Here we focus on possible future developments related to the new tools and methods discussed here -understanding why hyperribbons and emergence arise, using their boundaries as simpler models, relations to emergence in physics, new Bayesian priors, and visualization methods that bypass the curse of dimensionality.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization studies are important in the initial design of particle accelerator systems, when many trade-offs between possible setting combinations have to be explored. In practice, multiobjective optimization with genetic algorithms (GAs) [1,2] is frequently used for finding optimal setting combinations (see [3][4][5][6][7] for accelerator-specific examples). One advantage of using multiobjective optimization is that it enables one to examine optimal trade-offs between achievable beam parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realizing the design performance in spite of the many inevitable imperfections in the real machines is very challenging. In recent years, it has become a trend for accelerator physicists to resort to online optimization, i.e., directly optimizing the control parameters of the machines with computer algorithms during operation, to bring out the best machine performance and reduce tuning time ( Huang et al, 2013 ; Pang and Rybarcyk, 2014 ; Tian et al, 2014 ; Huang, 2016 ; Olsson, 2018 ; Bergan et al, 2019 ; Duris et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%