2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.11.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online spectrophotometric determination of Fe(II) and Fe(III) by flow injection combined with low pressure ion chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…434 Recent years have brought several interesting applications of this methodology both in FIA and SIA systems, and many of them are broadly reported in the review papers. 71,73,75 In an FIA system with a laboratory-packed low-pressure cation exchange column, Fe(II) and Fe(III) were determined with spectrophotometric detection, 435 while in a multicommutated FIA system with UV detection, various commercial reversed-phase fused-core columns were examined for determination of alkylparabens. 436 In the results of very similar studies conducted in the SIA system, the same authors reported that with a fusedcore RP-amide column, much lower LOD values were obtained: 3.1 to 4.6 μg L −1 .…”
Section: Hyphenation Of Flow Injection Methods With High-performance ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…434 Recent years have brought several interesting applications of this methodology both in FIA and SIA systems, and many of them are broadly reported in the review papers. 71,73,75 In an FIA system with a laboratory-packed low-pressure cation exchange column, Fe(II) and Fe(III) were determined with spectrophotometric detection, 435 while in a multicommutated FIA system with UV detection, various commercial reversed-phase fused-core columns were examined for determination of alkylparabens. 436 In the results of very similar studies conducted in the SIA system, the same authors reported that with a fusedcore RP-amide column, much lower LOD values were obtained: 3.1 to 4.6 μg L −1 .…”
Section: Hyphenation Of Flow Injection Methods With High-performance ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to evaluate Fe(II) or Fe(III) ions with high sensitivity using an optical Phimhb sensor, according to LOD values (Table 1). When compared to the detection limits of other reagents or sensors [24,27–38] (based on colorimetric approach) previously reported for the determination of silver ions, the produced optical sensor has a very low detection limit (Table 2). The high sensitivity of the Phimhb sensor was judged by using nanomaterial (mesoporous silica nanospheres) as a carrier which improved the sensitivity of the immobilized reagents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated limits of detection (LODs) using the two sensors were very low (0.026 ppm by using the 3-fsa-MSNT sensor and 0.023 ppm by using the 5-fsa-MSNT sensor). Consequently, it is possible to determine ultra-traces of Fe­(III) ions using the two sensors with high sensitivity better than other spectrophotometric methods as shown in Table . This may be attributed to the use of mesoporous silica nanotube nanomaterial as a carrier that boosted the sensitive property of the immobilized reagents (formylsalicylic acids), resulting in the high sensitivity of the 3-fsa-MSNT and 5-fsa-MSNT sensors. , It appears from Table that the 5-fsa-MSNT sensor has a lower LOD than the 3-fsa-MSNT sensor, and this may be because the positions of the hydroxyl and carboxylic groups are farther from the formyl group in the 5-fsa-MSNT structure than in the 3-fsa-MSNT structure.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%