2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online quantitative evaluation of expulsion in resistance spot welding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of resistance spot welds depends on the welding parameters and the type of materials. The parameters of resistance spot welding are the welding time, the welding current and the pressing force of the electrodes [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of resistance spot welds depends on the welding parameters and the type of materials. The parameters of resistance spot welding are the welding time, the welding current and the pressing force of the electrodes [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposition of the metal coating on the copper electrodes generates a change in the properties of the electrode and, therefore, the wear of the tips [19]. In addition to the reduction of the size of the nugget, the wear of the electrode is of great importance in the presence of weld ejections and other quality defects and can be the cause of 60% of quality problems [20].…”
Section: Electrode Wear and Millingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each scenario, two contamination models, referred to as Out E and Out P, with three increasing contamination levels, referred to as C1, C2 and C3, are considered. The former mimics a splash weld (expulsion), caused by excessive welding current, while the latter resembles phase shift of the peak time caused by an increased electrode force (Xia et al, 2019). Moreover, we consider also a scenario, referred to as Scenario 0, representing settings where the Phase I sample is not contaminated.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%