2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2011
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2011.330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Organization of an Offline Protest: From Social to Traditional Media and Back

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also showed that most of the filtering happened in "border ASes", that is, ASes that peer with foreign networks. In [65], Skoric et al provided a detailed analysis of how social media platforms (e.g., Facebook), as well as traditional media were used to organize a student protest against censorship in Singapore. They found that activists used social media to engage rather than circumvent traditional media stakeholders, in order to amplify their impact.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results also showed that most of the filtering happened in "border ASes", that is, ASes that peer with foreign networks. In [65], Skoric et al provided a detailed analysis of how social media platforms (e.g., Facebook), as well as traditional media were used to organize a student protest against censorship in Singapore. They found that activists used social media to engage rather than circumvent traditional media stakeholders, in order to amplify their impact.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings counter those of Al Sayyad and Guvenc (2013), that social media has led to increased offline mobilization. Moreover, online involvement on social media has not shaped offline protesting events, contrary to the findings of Enjolras, Steen-Johnsen, and Wollebaek (2013), Steinert-Threlkeld and others (2015), Skoric andothers (2011), andFuchs (2015), but has rather shaped the reporting of offline events-again providing another means of information publication or as Murthy (2011, 779) puts it, a "microphone for the masses." This means that social media has not been viewed as a communicative tool in isolation as there are other means available to existing campaign groups who have a wide range of campaigning repertoires.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, Cottle (, 867) explains that campaign groups, irrespective of size, seek out media attention for the wider dissemination of their campaign and politics, from local to global. This represents a model whereby online involvement can shape offline events to amplify their message (Enjolras, Steen‐Johnsen, and Wollebaek ; Fuchs ; Skoric et al ; Steinert‐Threlkeld et al ), but social media cannot be viewed as being a communication tool in isolation. This rise of activism through these social media channels highlights the shift from previous tactical repertoires that relied heavily on meetings, letters, public demonstrations (e.g., sit‐ins, speeches) and participating in civil disobedience (Harlow and Harp ) to more passive displays of support on social networking sites including “liking” and “sharing” content (Sandoval‐Almazan and Gil‐Garcia ).…”
Section: Social Media and Protestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results also showed that most of the filtering happened in "border ASes", that is, ASes that peer with foreign networks. In [53] Skoric et al provided a detailed analysis of how social media platforms (e.g., Facebook), as well as traditional media were used to organize a student protest against censorship in Singapore. They found that activists used social media to engage rather than circumvent traditional media stakeholders, in order to amplify their impact.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%