Online Misinformation and “Phantom Patterns”: Epistemic Exploitation in the Era of Big Data

Abstract

In this article, we examine how the availability of massive quantities of data, that is, the “Big Data” phenomenon, contributes to the creation, spread, and harms of online misinformation. Specifically, we argue that a factor in the problem of online misinformation is the evolved human instinct to recognize patterns. While the pattern‐recognition instinct is a crucial evolutionary adaptation, we argue that in the age of Big Data, these capacities have, unfortunately, rendered us vulnerable. Given the ways in which online media outlets profit from the spread of misinformation by preying on this pattern‐finding instinct, we conceptualize the problem that we identify as a morally objectionable form of “epistemic exploitation.” As we argue, the consumer of digital misinformation is often exploited by having her pattern‐recognition instinct used against her. This exploitation is morally objectionable because it deprives her of an epistemic good to which she has a right. This epistemic good is the integrity of the pattern‐recognition instinct itself, which, we argue, is a capacity that allows us to participate in uniquely human goods. While our primary goal is to bring attention to this form of epistemic exploitation, we conclude by briefly evaluating some general solutions to the growing problem of online misinformation.

Teaching Humanities and Social Sciences Interculturally

“…These experts understand misinformation and conspiracy theories' proclivity as a decadent tendency to make sense of the world, a result of lower analytical ability, or a by-product of a pathological mindset. 488 In other words, they accept the presupposition that misinformation and conspiracy theories have an epistemic nature, intending to inform us about the state of the world, albeit in a corrupted way. 489 However, if it were true that misinformation is merely a result of decadent instrumental rationality combined with individual psychological factors, we would expect to see random variations in the characteristics of conspiracy theories over time.…”

Bullshit in Politics Pays

“…Additionally, the effectiveness of fact-checkers relies upon a citizenry willing to accept the verdicts of such fact-checkers. Even if fact-checkers are generally reliable and unbiased, citizens may disregard their findings when they are incongruent with their political beliefs (Walter et al 2019;Fritts and Cabrera 2022b). Naturally, this sort of knee-jerk dismissal would be even more predictable were instances of genuine bias among fact-checkers to be documented, with bullshitting citizens erroneously tarring all fact-checkers with the same brush.…”

On the Political Epistemology of Female Circumcision in Africa

“…Megan Fritts & Frank Cabrera (2022) "Online Misinformation and 'Phantom Patterns': Epistemic Exploitation in the Era of Big Data," Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 60, Issue 1: 57-59.77 Adam Gibbons (2022) "Is Epistocracy Irrational?"…”