2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2015.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Clinical Education Training for Preceptors: A Pilot QI Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations of the current study include the inability to use all responses due to the invalidity of some of the codes mentioned (i.e., missing code or different code than specified). However, the matching pairs for PSEQ and knowledge assessments did not seem low compared to other pilot studies 19,56,57 . Another limitation is that only those who have access to computers were able to participate in the study, while those who encountered technical issues were not involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limitations of the current study include the inability to use all responses due to the invalidity of some of the codes mentioned (i.e., missing code or different code than specified). However, the matching pairs for PSEQ and knowledge assessments did not seem low compared to other pilot studies 19,56,57 . Another limitation is that only those who have access to computers were able to participate in the study, while those who encountered technical issues were not involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the matching pairs for PSEQ and knowledge assessments did not seem low compared to other pilot studies. 19,56,57 Another limitation is that only those who have access to computers were able to participate in the study, while those who encountered technical issues were not involved. Moreover, there were potential biases due to self-evaluation conducted by the preceptors, which may warrant caution when interpreting the study findings.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although different instructional design features have been used, results reveal that online preceptor programs are informative, supportive, and highly valued (Wu et al, 2020). Moreover, findings from a systematic review conducted by Wu et al (2018) showed that these programs enhance preceptors’ knowledge and skills, self-efficacy, and leadership practices (Larsen & Zahner, 2011; Wilkinson et al, 2015). According to Myrick et al (2011) using online resources to exchange information and knowledge with colleagues is fundamental for preceptors to grow as professionals and develop a stronger sense of self-validation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%