2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijbis.2013.052050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online banking information systems acceptance: a structural equation modelling analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Then for the measurement estimation results of relationship each variable www.ijacsa.thesai.org constructs and indicators can be seen in Table 7, which is the result of structural test model fit through path analysis. Relations between constructs and indicators according to [23] can be seen by looking at the p-value and critical ratio (tvalue). Referring to the results of the constructs estimation relationship with its indicator refers to …”
Section: H Model Fit Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then for the measurement estimation results of relationship each variable www.ijacsa.thesai.org constructs and indicators can be seen in Table 7, which is the result of structural test model fit through path analysis. Relations between constructs and indicators according to [23] can be seen by looking at the p-value and critical ratio (tvalue). Referring to the results of the constructs estimation relationship with its indicator refers to …”
Section: H Model Fit Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Davis, 1989). Previous studies also using technology acceptance model as a guiding theory such as in the field of online banking information systems acceptance (Chandio, Abbasi, Nizamani & Nizamani, 2013) and cloud computing adoption by companies (Dachyar & Prasetya, 2012) which both of the research area related to technology adoption.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Model (Tam)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its main purpose was to predict IT/IS acceptance and pinpoint any design flaws before the system were launched and utilized by the users (Chandio, 2011).…”
Section: User Acceptance Theories and Tammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, the measurement of actual use construct is based on users' self-reporting about their actual use; especially when there is no objective usage metrics (electronic log for example) are available, like the case that is being investigated here. Therefore, it is common in TAM studies that aim to predict IT/IS acceptance to measure acceptance by behavioral intention rather than actual usage (Chandio, 2011;Mathieson et al, 2001). This is also consistent with the findings of several previous studies that showed that TAM basic constructs perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use have direct relationship with behavioral intention, but not with the actual usage (Gefen and Straub, 2000;Jarvenpaa et al, 2000).…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%