2016
DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online aggression: The influences of anonymity and social modeling.

Abstract: Behavioral temptation to aggress and participant blog responses following a group word-unscrambling game were examined in situations of anonymity and neutral or aggressive social modeling. Anonymous participants were more aggressive than nonanonymous participants. Also, social modeling seemed to moderate the effect of anonymity on behavioral temptation to aggress as well as verbal aggression via blog posts. Specifically, anonymous participants responded more aggressively when they viewed aggressive models foll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(77 reference statements)
2
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows for freer exchange of information in both directions, which makes it difficult to distinguish between validated and questionable content. In addition, people are more likely to be aggressive when they can hide behind anonymity (Zimmerman & Ybarra, 2016); while many academics tweet and blog under their real name, others instead use a pseudonym or anonymous account for one or both of these activities. Indeed, some skeptics of social media as a tool for science communication are concerned with what they perceive to be excessive and verbally aggressive criticism conducted via these channels (Fiske, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for freer exchange of information in both directions, which makes it difficult to distinguish between validated and questionable content. In addition, people are more likely to be aggressive when they can hide behind anonymity (Zimmerman & Ybarra, 2016); while many academics tweet and blog under their real name, others instead use a pseudonym or anonymous account for one or both of these activities. Indeed, some skeptics of social media as a tool for science communication are concerned with what they perceive to be excessive and verbally aggressive criticism conducted via these channels (Fiske, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several classic studies on the effects of anonymity have found it to play a key role in enabling antinormative and criminal behaviours (Cannavale, Scarr & Pepitone, 1970;Kiesler, Siegel and McGuire, 1984;Mann, 1981;Mathes and Guest, 1976), as well as in increasing aggression (Donnerstein, Donnerstein, Simon, & Ditrichs, 1972;Mathes & Kahn, 1975;Page & Moss, 1976). These patterns have been observed in recent studies on computer-mediated communication as well: Santana (2014), for example, found that Internet comments posted anonymously were more frequently "uncivil" compared to comments posted nonanonymously, while other studies have identified positive relationships between anonymity and cyberbullying (Barlett;Moore, Nakano, Enomoto, & Suda, 2012) and anonymity and "cyber-aggression" (Wright, 2013(Wright, , 2014Zimmerman & Ybarra, 2014), respectively. Consistent with deindividuation theories, these findings suggest that those who engage in Internet vigilantism may often be law-abiding individuals who, with the aid of the Internet, are empowered to behave in ways contrary to that of how they would in the "real world" (see Suler, 2004).…”
Section: Naming Shaming and Internet Vigilantismmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Fanatisme merupakan salah satu faktor pendorong terjadinya perilaku agresif verbal di media sosial, seperti dalam penelitian ini diketahui bahwa fanatisme memberikan sumbangan terhadap perilaku agresif verbal di media sosial yaitu sebanyak 39%, namun terdapat faktor-faktor lain yang menyebabkan perilaku agresif verbal di media sosial 61% seperti dapat ditinjau dari berbagai aspek tidak hanya fanatisme tapi juga dari identitas diri, kepribadian, faktor lingkungan sosial, dan juga keterbukaan media sosial itu sendiri (Zimmerman, 2012).…”
Section: Jenni Eliani M Salis Yuniardi Alifah Nabilah Masturahunclassified