2013
DOI: 10.2514/1.60375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Aerodynamic Model Identification Using a Recursive Sequential Method for Multivariate Splines

Abstract: Avoiding high computational loads is essential to online aerodynamic model identification algorithms, which are at the heart of any model-based adaptive flight control system. Multivariate simplex B-spline (MVSB) methods are excellent function approximation tools for modeling the nonlinear aerodynamics of high performance aircraft.However, the computational efficiency of the MVSB method must be improved in order to enable real-time onboard applications, for example in adaptive nonlinear flight control systems.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, NDI can not be used alone, controller must be used to compensate the model error. Three approaches might be used to reduce the model error sensitivity associated with NDI: 1) Approximate the model error online and cancel it further by adaptive augmentation, Neural Networks (NN) can be used as a universal approximater and trained in real time with tracking error excitation [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] , .input dynamics like the common actuator saturation, which may cause misadaptation, can be considered and hidden by Pseudo Control Hedging (PCH), the NDI based adaptive NN controller plus PCH architecture has been successfully flight tested in a number of applications 17,18 , new development under this framework includes efficient online model substitution 20 and nonparametric adaptive nonlinearity representation 19 2) Robust mu controller augmentation. Uncertainties in model, sensor and actuator dynamics and considered in the mu framework, a robust controller is designed such that the closed loop stability retains with bounded perturbation 21,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, NDI can not be used alone, controller must be used to compensate the model error. Three approaches might be used to reduce the model error sensitivity associated with NDI: 1) Approximate the model error online and cancel it further by adaptive augmentation, Neural Networks (NN) can be used as a universal approximater and trained in real time with tracking error excitation [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] , .input dynamics like the common actuator saturation, which may cause misadaptation, can be considered and hidden by Pseudo Control Hedging (PCH), the NDI based adaptive NN controller plus PCH architecture has been successfully flight tested in a number of applications 17,18 , new development under this framework includes efficient online model substitution 20 and nonparametric adaptive nonlinearity representation 19 2) Robust mu controller augmentation. Uncertainties in model, sensor and actuator dynamics and considered in the mu framework, a robust controller is designed such that the closed loop stability retains with bounded perturbation 21,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle the uncertainties in the control effectiveness matrix, techniques involving tuning functions [18], the least-squares method [19], and immersion and invariance [20] have been applied to the estimator design, and these estimators were evaluated in [21]. To improve the computational efficiency of the multivariate simplex B-spline method [22], [23], a novel recursive sequential method [24] enabling real-time onboard applications was proposed for modelling the nonlinear aerodynamics of high-performance aircraft. In [25], a novel real-time identification strategy for multivariate splines was proposed to address the aerodynamic uncertainties in the control allocation system, and the computational complexity of the novel multivariate splines was even lower than that of the recursive B-splines method developed in [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%