2018
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One‐year weight losses in the Tianjin Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevention Programme: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract: The 1-year lifestyle intervention led to significant weight losses after delivery in women who had GDM, and the effect was more pronounced in women who were overweight at baseline.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining studies were carried out in Australia ( n = 1/14) [84], Canada ( n = 1/14) [85], Finland ( n = 1/14) [86], Ireland ( n = 1/14) [87], Spain ( n = 1/14) [88] and Thailand ( n = 1/14) [89]. Of these intervention studies, the large majority were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ( n = 9/14) [76, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 87–89] and the remaining studies were intervention trials ( n = 5/14), with two of them ( n = 2/5) containing a control group [80, 83] and the other three ( n = 3/5) using a pre/post-test design [77, 85, 86]. The majority of the included studies were published between 2011 and 2015 ( n = 10/16) [76, 77, 81, 8389], whereas the remaining studies were published between 2006 and 2010 ( n = 3/16) [74, 78, 80] and 2016–2018 ( n = 2/16) [75, 82].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining studies were carried out in Australia ( n = 1/14) [84], Canada ( n = 1/14) [85], Finland ( n = 1/14) [86], Ireland ( n = 1/14) [87], Spain ( n = 1/14) [88] and Thailand ( n = 1/14) [89]. Of these intervention studies, the large majority were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ( n = 9/14) [76, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 87–89] and the remaining studies were intervention trials ( n = 5/14), with two of them ( n = 2/5) containing a control group [80, 83] and the other three ( n = 3/5) using a pre/post-test design [77, 85, 86]. The majority of the included studies were published between 2011 and 2015 ( n = 10/16) [76, 77, 81, 8389], whereas the remaining studies were published between 2006 and 2010 ( n = 3/16) [74, 78, 80] and 2016–2018 ( n = 2/16) [75, 82].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then excluded 23 additional studies, remaining with a total of 15 studies. The reasons for exclusion were: not a randomized controlled trial ( n = 4) ( 30 – 33 ), not reporting our primary outcomes ( n = 13) ( 34 46 ), study population not meeting our inclusion criteria specification ( n = 4) ( 47 50 ) and different reports from the same study ( n = 2) ( 51 , 52 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a successful lifestyle modification programme has the potential to reduce the risk of progression to diabetes, data are required to demonstrate its feasibility and scalability in resource‐constrained environments. The LIVING study, along with other completed and ongoing studies of relevance summarized in Table , is designed to provide practical new evidence in this critical area of need .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a successful lifestyle modification programme has the potential to reduce the risk of progression to diabetes, data are required to demonstrate its feasibility and scalability in resource-constrained environments. The LIVING study, along with other completed and ongoing studies of relevance summarized in Table 2, is designed to provide practical new evidence in this critical area of need [17][18][19]. Despite its strengths in multiple domains, this study may face challenges in terms of recruitment, engagement with programme, and retention for long term follow up, as has been observed in other similar recent published trials [17].…”
Section: % Of Participants Completed the Year 1 Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%