2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step lipid extraction for plasma lipidomics analysis by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the most commonly used pretreatments and detection technologies include SPE, LLE , LC–MS, and GC–MS , etc. However, conventional extraction methods like hydrophilic polymer‐based SPE and LLE have several shortcomings, such as long sample preparation time , serious loss of analyte, a limited selection of extractants suitable for LLE, and a narrow pH range . SPE technology has become an ideal choice due to several advantages, which include rapid enrichment and separation, high recovery, good precision, and less sample consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the most commonly used pretreatments and detection technologies include SPE, LLE , LC–MS, and GC–MS , etc. However, conventional extraction methods like hydrophilic polymer‐based SPE and LLE have several shortcomings, such as long sample preparation time , serious loss of analyte, a limited selection of extractants suitable for LLE, and a narrow pH range . SPE technology has become an ideal choice due to several advantages, which include rapid enrichment and separation, high recovery, good precision, and less sample consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another report showed that recovery values for PC, PE and PI species were almost equivalent for methanol, ethanol and 2-propanol. Slightly higher recoveries of some LPC species were observed for methanol, which also proved to be the best for all tested LPI species [83].…”
Section: Isolation Of Pl Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A recently published comparison of chloroform and MTBE protocols suggests that the MTBE method is more efficient for glycerophospholipids, ceramides, and unsaturated fatty acids, while the chloroform protocol is superior for saturated fatty acids and plasmalogens [14]. Recently, an interesting one-step extraction protocol for mouse plasma was published by Satomi et al [15]. The authors compare methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, and acetonitrile to the MTBE method described above.…”
Section: Liquid-liquid Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with such uncertainty, many users have transferred from triple-quadrupole instruments to high-resolution mass spectrometers with quadrupole-time of flight (Q-TOF) or Orbitrap technology [27,29,31]. While Q-TOF-based technology offers the mass resolution of 40,000 needed to separate the above-described isobaric example of plasmalogens and diacyl PC species, the mass resolution required to separate 13 C, 17 O, 2 H, or 15 N isotopologues from either each other or other monoisotopic lipid species is above 100,000, and can only be provided by Orbitrap or ion cyclotron technology. Nevertheless, in natural samples, all minor isotopes except for 13 C can be neglected for practical purposes due to their low abundances, but it is highly beneficial to separate the M + 2 isotopic peak of a lipid, which is mainly due to 13 C, from the monoisotopic mass peak of the same lipid with one double bond less.…”
Section: Direct Infusion Lipidomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation