2022
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7329202200218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“One Single Agriculture”: Dismantling Policies and Silencing Peasant Family Farmers in Brazilian Foreign Policy (2016-2022)

Abstract: Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Among the scholarly community, certain aligned with the more established currents of Foreign Policy Analysis and expounded upon paradigmatic shifts in voting trends at the United Nations (UN) and bilateral diplomatic interactions (involving nations like the United States, China, and South American counterparts) (Casarões, 2020;Lopes et al, 2022). Others relied on transnational policy frameworks to unpack radical policy change and dismantling in specific foreign policy agendas, including international human rights stances (Silva do Monte & De Carvalho Hernandez, 2022) and international development cooperation and policy transfer initiatives (Grisa et al, 2022;Lima et al, 2022;Luiz & Milani, 2022;. Besides revealing the contours of (radical) foreign policy change between 2019 and 2022, this scholarship also highlighted instances of policy resilience and continuity amidst an aggressive presidential dismantling rhetoric (Casarões, 2020;Lopes, 2020;Morais de Sá e Silva, 2021;De Sá Guimarães & De Oliveira e Silva, 2021;Lopes et al, 2022).…”
Section: Brazil An Emblematic Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5 Among the scholarly community, certain aligned with the more established currents of Foreign Policy Analysis and expounded upon paradigmatic shifts in voting trends at the United Nations (UN) and bilateral diplomatic interactions (involving nations like the United States, China, and South American counterparts) (Casarões, 2020;Lopes et al, 2022). Others relied on transnational policy frameworks to unpack radical policy change and dismantling in specific foreign policy agendas, including international human rights stances (Silva do Monte & De Carvalho Hernandez, 2022) and international development cooperation and policy transfer initiatives (Grisa et al, 2022;Lima et al, 2022;Luiz & Milani, 2022;. Besides revealing the contours of (radical) foreign policy change between 2019 and 2022, this scholarship also highlighted instances of policy resilience and continuity amidst an aggressive presidential dismantling rhetoric (Casarões, 2020;Lopes, 2020;Morais de Sá e Silva, 2021;De Sá Guimarães & De Oliveira e Silva, 2021;Lopes et al, 2022).…”
Section: Brazil An Emblematic Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 At the same time, scholarship has also mapped evolving forms of individual and collective, formal and informal, public and behind the scene bureaucratic responses since the 2016 impeachment and even more so since 2019, under Bolsonaro (Lotta et al, 2023). Responses by those working on foreign policy issues have been less systematically explored in the literature, but existing studies have described bureaucratic strategies such as partnering with UN entities to secure the continuity of international projects and individuals moving to work with international and non-governmental organisations to carry on disseminating Brazil's "policy solutions" (e.g., Morais de Sá e Silva 2019; Lima et al, 2022). More recent anecdotal evidence also shows subversive types of collective mobilisation, such as a network of Brazilian diplomats that held secret meetings to sabotage Bolsonaro's foreign policy and ensure Brazilian credibility and longstanding partnerships with third countries (Chade, 2022).…”
Section: The Strategic Transnationalisation By Bureaucrats and Policy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…O desmantelamento das políticas domésticas e dos espaços institucionais engajados no tema da agricultura familiar afetou uma parte importante da construção narrativa que dava abertura política para a incidência da Contag em política externa: a lógica de coexistência institucional entre os dois modelos de desenvolvimento (LUIZ, MILANI, 2022). Com a internalização da agenda da agricultura familiar no Mapa, restou o discurso de uma única agricultura, incompatível com a lógica até então desenvolvida pela narrativa da política externa de exportação de dois modelos de desenvolvimento (LUIZ, MILANI, 2022;SERAFIM, 2022).…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified