“…The analytical performance of the developed method was compared with the previously reported methods for the determination of tyrosinase activity ,− as abridged in Table S5. These methods suffer from several drawbacks, including the dependence on nonselective quenching of a fluorophore by the produced quinone from the enzymatic reaction, ,, the use of synthetic substrates that will react with tyrosinase in several ways different from natural substrates that could lead to false results, ,,,,, complicated synthesis of the sensing probes, ,,,, or the use of time-consuming fluorogenic reaction (1.5 h) . On the other hand, the proposed method is very simple and showed higher sensitivity than many of the previously reported methods − ,,, and similar sensitivity to others, ,,, and thus it could be a better choice for tyrosinase activity assay.…”