2018
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One model to rule them all? Governing images in the shadow of the disease model of addiction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Informed by debates and practices in Sweden, Storbjörk (2018) also advocated for the maintenance of multiple treatment models in practice when arguing that different conceptions of addiction within treatment settings may facilitate better matches between service users with different needs and treatment providers. Storbjörk discussed the contested medicalization of addiction in the 'nonmedical stronghold' of the Nordic countries (see Chapter 36, this volume).…”
Section: Implications For Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informed by debates and practices in Sweden, Storbjörk (2018) also advocated for the maintenance of multiple treatment models in practice when arguing that different conceptions of addiction within treatment settings may facilitate better matches between service users with different needs and treatment providers. Storbjörk discussed the contested medicalization of addiction in the 'nonmedical stronghold' of the Nordic countries (see Chapter 36, this volume).…”
Section: Implications For Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Storbjörk [3] discusses the contested medicalization of addiction in the 'non-medical stronghold' of the Nordic countries. As she states, in Sweden, key stakeholders within AOD treatment and policy resist abandoning the social tradition in favour of biomedical understandings of addiction problems (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their responses to our systematic review of treatment providers' views about the disease model of addiction [1], Savic and Lubman [2] and Storbjörk [3] make compelling cases against attempting to 'standardise' treatments to address contradictory explanations that treatment seekers may face. Savic and Lubman's argument against implementing an 'overarching, universal addiction model' is threefold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations