2018
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of treatment providers’ varying conceptions of the disease model of addiction: A response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, tailoring care to a client's needs may have clinical benefits ( Savic & Lubman, 2018 ). However, whilst this might make for holistic, tailored care, it is unclear whether offering a broad spectrum of interventions (e.g., abstinence, harm reduction services) based on different ontologies of addiction (e.g., whether addiction is a disease, social problem) might contribute to confusion among clients, which in turn could undermine treatment engagement ( Barnett, Hall, Fry, Dilkes-Frayne, & Carter, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, tailoring care to a client's needs may have clinical benefits ( Savic & Lubman, 2018 ). However, whilst this might make for holistic, tailored care, it is unclear whether offering a broad spectrum of interventions (e.g., abstinence, harm reduction services) based on different ontologies of addiction (e.g., whether addiction is a disease, social problem) might contribute to confusion among clients, which in turn could undermine treatment engagement ( Barnett, Hall, Fry, Dilkes-Frayne, & Carter, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, clients accessing treatment may be presented with multiple, even contradictory, views about the factors underlying their drug problems and how to treat them. One avenue to address treatment providers' multiple ontologies of addiction is for policymakers responsible for service design to consider standardizing care via the implementation of an overarching, universal addiction treatment model (Barnett, Hall et al, 2018a, 2018b. One way to implement this may be to: (i) use standard intake and assessment systems across a treatment sector; (ii) standardize interventions and map client treatment pathways; and (iii) ensure treatment approaches are harmonized across a treatment sector (e.g., by following a harm reduction approach).…”
Section: Implications For Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrastingly, disease models of addiction, such as the brain disease model of addiction (for a critical discussion of this specific model, see e.g. [18]), assume that addictive behaviour is caused by disease symptomatology and cannot be helped ( [19], p. 117, [20]). Thus, addiction is perceived as a (medical) illness.…”
Section: Swiss Disability Insurance and Recent Changes In Legislationmentioning
confidence: 99%