“…This reduction is evident because the filtered dye blocks channel entry on the membrane surfaces. 28,29 The rejection rates of the dye solutions (MR, MnB, BBG, EB, and RosB) were 93.2, 99.9, 98.2, 87.8, and 96.6% for the slot-die coated Ti 3 C 2 T x membranes and 77.9, 86.3, 94.2, 46.2, and 97.9% for the vacuum-filtered Ti 3 C 2 T x membranes, respectively (Figure 4B), indicating the better separation ability of the slotdie-coated membrane. The inset images show the solutions before and after filtration: F is feed, V is permeate of the vacuumfiltered membrane, S is permeate of the slot-die-coated membrane.…”