1996
DOI: 10.1006/aphy.1996.0118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Dimensional Autonomous Systems and Dissipative Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for not getting the Lagrangian and generalized linear momentum from the first integral (A.1) reported in Refs. [23,24] is as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for not getting the Lagrangian and generalized linear momentum from the first integral (A.1) reported in Refs. [23,24] is as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation(23) (for any b(t), c(t)) admits a Lagrangian description with the reciprocal Lagrangian of the form L = (ẋf (t) + xg(t)) −1 , where f is given by(26) and g = 2f b −ḟ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very well known that for non dissipative systems the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian can be easily obtained by subtracting or adding respectively the kinetic and potential energy of the system (Goldstein, 1980), but when we have dissipation in our dynamical system this construction is not useful and the corresponding Lagrangian and Hamiltonian is certainly not trivial to obtain (González, 2004;López, 1996). The reason is that there is not yet a consistent Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation for dissipative systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%