2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One cue does not fit all: A systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cueing on freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(535 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the coupling strength between steps and cues varies with cueing modalities: the stronger gait is tied to the cue, the greater the gait-modifying effects of the cues, yielding superior effects for visual cues ( 14 , 15 ), followed by auditory and somatosensory cues. As the response of people with PD to cueing is highly variable [e.g., a person with PD showing responsiveness to 3D cues, but not to 2D cues ( 16 )], flexibility is required for tailoring cues to this heterogeneity, as well as to individual-specific gait characteristics ( 1 , 17 ), which may be challenging for some existing one-size-fits-all types or forms of cueing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the coupling strength between steps and cues varies with cueing modalities: the stronger gait is tied to the cue, the greater the gait-modifying effects of the cues, yielding superior effects for visual cues ( 14 , 15 ), followed by auditory and somatosensory cues. As the response of people with PD to cueing is highly variable [e.g., a person with PD showing responsiveness to 3D cues, but not to 2D cues ( 16 )], flexibility is required for tailoring cues to this heterogeneity, as well as to individual-specific gait characteristics ( 1 , 17 ), which may be challenging for some existing one-size-fits-all types or forms of cueing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though early AR cueing research in people with PD with the first-generation AR headsets did not find any significant improvements on FoG, the results were still encouraging as subjective benefits of AR cueing are often reported ( 23 25 ). The lack of positive findings may be related to the limited AR field of view (AR-FOV) of the AR headsets ( 18 , 23 , 26 , 27 ), an insufficient familiarization period to AR headsets ( 23 ), the fact that only one specific visual cue was implemented ( 1 , 17 ), or the emphasis on FoG as an outcome measure instead of other valuable gait characteristics like gait speed and step length, susceptible to improvement with AR cueing ( 20 , 25 , 28 , 29 ). In the present study we address these issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with FOG describe a feeling that their feet are "glued" or "magnetically stuck" to the floor. FOG has traditionally been associated with Parkinson's disease (PD), yet it is more common in atypical forms of parkinsonism, such as progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy (MSA) (Factor, 2008;Rezvanian et al, 2020;Cosentino et al, 2023). 10.3389/fnins.2023.1194904 However, limited studies have reported the prevalence of FOG in patients with MSA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,10 Non-pharmacological treatment for FOG comprises teaching patients to use sensory cues, defined as providing "discrete targets for the (re-)execution of movement". 11 Still, the evidence that cueing reduces FOG in daily life is scarce [12][13][14] because of the difficulty of assessing FOG 15,16 and the practical challenges of applying cues to an episodic phenomenon. Furthermore, it is largely unknown whether cueing is equally effective off and on medication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is largely unknown whether cueing is equally effective off and on medication. 14 Recent work has shown the potential of technological devices to deliver cues in daily life 12,13 including lasershoes, 17 laser-canes, 18 augmented reality glasses, 19 vibrating socks or other tactile cues, 20,21 and smartphones for auditory cueing. [22][23][24] Many of these tools present cues continuously or require patients to trigger the cues themselves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%