Abstract:The outcome of penalty shootouts is often referred to as a 'lottery', with the determining factor being luck rather than the skill level of the player. Throughout this article we hope to show why such attitudes towards physical and psychological preparation can diminish the perceived control of penalty takers and can negatively affect their behaviour and subsequent performance. From the synthesis of this evidence we provide task-specific recommendations that are structured around the dynamic nature of emotions… Show more
“…As such, we could surmise that participants were more likely to engage with rational self-talk statements prior to the task because they perceived rational self-talk as more useful, and consequently, performance was facilitated due to a positive self-fulfilling prophecy (Rosenthan & Jacobson, 1968). Second, previous researchers (e.g., Wood, Jordet, & Wilson, 2015) have suggested, and some researchers (e.g., Dixon, Turner, & Gillman, 2016) have found, positive associations between irrational beliefs and threat cognitive appraisals in relation to motivated performance situation. To explain, those with a rational view may be less likely to make a threat appraisals due to a realistic perspective of success and failure (i.e., "underperforming would be bad but certainly not the end of the world") and less likely to condemn themselves wholly for a behaviour (i.e., "I cannot be rated wholly as a failure for underperforming in a single instance").…”
The investigation of rational emotive behaviour therapy (REBT) in sport settings is growing, but controlled experimental field studies are sparse. In the limited extant literature, researchers have found that irrational (extreme, rigid, and illogical) self-talk leads to disrupted motor skill performance, compared to rational (non-extreme, flexible, and logical) self-talk. However, methodological limitations of past research and the absence of sport-relevant tasks limit the application of findings to athletic settings. Therefore, the current study examined the effects of rational and irrational self-talk on the pressured putting performance of amateur golfers, by adopting a controlled and field-based experimental study design. A two-way repeated-measures ANCOVA, controlling for baseline putting ability, revealed that golfers' putting accuracy was significantly better when using rational self-talk than when using irrational self-talk. In addition, one-samples and paired-samples t-tests showed that golfers reported that rational self-talk was more usable than the irrational self-talk, and perceived the rational self-talk to be more facilitative than the irrational self-talk for their putting performance. The results are discussed with reference to potential explanatory mechanisms, study limitations, and future research needs.
“…As such, we could surmise that participants were more likely to engage with rational self-talk statements prior to the task because they perceived rational self-talk as more useful, and consequently, performance was facilitated due to a positive self-fulfilling prophecy (Rosenthan & Jacobson, 1968). Second, previous researchers (e.g., Wood, Jordet, & Wilson, 2015) have suggested, and some researchers (e.g., Dixon, Turner, & Gillman, 2016) have found, positive associations between irrational beliefs and threat cognitive appraisals in relation to motivated performance situation. To explain, those with a rational view may be less likely to make a threat appraisals due to a realistic perspective of success and failure (i.e., "underperforming would be bad but certainly not the end of the world") and less likely to condemn themselves wholly for a behaviour (i.e., "I cannot be rated wholly as a failure for underperforming in a single instance").…”
The investigation of rational emotive behaviour therapy (REBT) in sport settings is growing, but controlled experimental field studies are sparse. In the limited extant literature, researchers have found that irrational (extreme, rigid, and illogical) self-talk leads to disrupted motor skill performance, compared to rational (non-extreme, flexible, and logical) self-talk. However, methodological limitations of past research and the absence of sport-relevant tasks limit the application of findings to athletic settings. Therefore, the current study examined the effects of rational and irrational self-talk on the pressured putting performance of amateur golfers, by adopting a controlled and field-based experimental study design. A two-way repeated-measures ANCOVA, controlling for baseline putting ability, revealed that golfers' putting accuracy was significantly better when using rational self-talk than when using irrational self-talk. In addition, one-samples and paired-samples t-tests showed that golfers reported that rational self-talk was more usable than the irrational self-talk, and perceived the rational self-talk to be more facilitative than the irrational self-talk for their putting performance. The results are discussed with reference to potential explanatory mechanisms, study limitations, and future research needs.
“…The examination of these types of questions would validate the feasibility of using VR for sporting scenarios where anxiety and distraction are prevalent and athletes need to maintain attentional control in order to avoid performance disruptions. Training in such situations is likely to desensitize players to threatening stimuli and provide a greater sense of perceived control (Wood et al 2015).…”
Virtual reality (VR) provides the potential for immersive and engaging training solutions for improving sport performance. However, if VR training is to be adopted and used in an effective and evidence-based fashion, a more rigorous assessment of the validity of the simulation is required. Construct validity is the degree to which the simulation provides an accurate representation of core features of the task. In the context of sport, if the training drills in the VR environment are a true representation of the skills needed in the real world, then those that excel at the sport in the real world should also excel in the virtual one. In this experiment, we examined the construct validity of a soccer-specific VR simulator by recruiting professional, academy, and novice players. Seventeen participants in each group completed four VR soccer drills, and the VR software provided scores relating to performance and process (e.g., passing accuracy, composure, reaction time, and adaptability). Based on these scores, an algorithm gave a diagnostic score relating to the predicted ability of the player. Results showed that this VR platform successfully differentiated between participants of differing skill levels. These results provide some support for the construct validity of this VR simulator and suggest at least partial overlap between the perceptualcognitive and motor skills needed to perform well across 'real' and virtual environments. Further work is needed to explore the validity and fidelity of the simulation before its adoption as a training device can be fully endorsed.
“…Penalties and in particular shoot-outs are often termed a "lottery" [9]. However, in recent years, attempts have been made to better understand and explain their outcomes scientifically [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.