BackgroundApproximately 80% of internet users access health information online and patients with chronic illnesses especially rely on internet-based resources. YouTube ranks second among the most accessed websites worldwide and hosts an increasing number of videos with medical information. However, their quality is sometimes unscientific, misleading, or even harmful.ObjectiveAs little is known about YouTube as a source of information on psoriasis, we aimed to investigate the quality of psoriasis-related videos and, if necessary, point out strategies for their improvement.MethodsThe quality of the 100 most viewed psoriasis-related videos was assessed using the DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) by categorizing the videos into useful, misleading, and dangerous and by evaluating the reception of the videos by users.ResultsEvaluation of the videos exhibited a total of 117,221,391 views and a total duration of 10:28 hour. The majority of clips contained anecdotal personal experiences with complementary and alternative psoriasis treatments, topical treatments, and nutrition and diets being the most frequently addressed topics. While advertisements accounted for 26.0% (26/100) of the videos, evidence-based health information amounted to only 20.0% (20/100); 32.0% (32/100) of the videos were classified as useful, 52.0% (52/100) as misleading, and 11.0% (11/100) as even dangerous. The quality of the videos evaluated by DISCERN and GQS was generally low (1.87 and 1.95, respectively, on a 1 to 5 scale with 5 being the maximum). Moreover, we found that viewers rated poor-quality videos better than higher quality videos.ConclusionsOur in-depth study demonstrates that nearly two-thirds of the psoriasis-related videos we analyzed disseminate misleading or even dangerous content. Subjective anecdotal and unscientific content is disproportionately overrepresented and poor-quality videos are predominantly rated positively by users, while higher quality video clips receive less positive ratings. Strategies by professional dermatological organizations are urgently needed to improve the quality of information on psoriasis on YouTube and other social media.
Background In recent years, YouTube has become a recognized source of medical information for health care consumers. Although YouTube has advantages in this context, there are potential dangers as videos may contain nonscientific, misleading, or even harmful information. Objective As little is known about YouTube as a source of information on atopic dermatitis (AD), we investigated the content-related quality of AD videos and their perception among YouTube users. Methods The quality of the 100 most viewed AD videos was assessed by using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the DISCERN instrument. Videos were classified as “useful,” “misleading,” and “potentially harmful,” and the correlations of viewers’ ratings (likes) with the GQS and DISCERN scores were assessed. Results Among the 100 videos, 68.0% (68/100) and 62.0% (62/100) were of poor and very poor scientific quality, respectively. Additionally, 32.0% (32/100) of the videos were classified as useful, 48.0% (48/100) were classified as misleading, and 34.0% (34/100) were classified as potentially harmful. Viewers’ ratings did not correlate with the GQS and DISCERN scores. Overall, 50.0% (50/100) of the videos were posted by private individuals and promoters of complementary/alternative treatments, 42.0% (42/100) by therapeutical advertisers, and only 8.0% (8/100) by nonprofit organizations/universities. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that two-thirds of the videos analyzed were below acceptable medical quality standards and that many videos were disseminating misleading or even dangerous content. Subjective and anecdotal content was overrepresented, and viewers did not appear to be able to distinguish between high- and low-quality videos. Health promotion strategies by professional medical organizations are needed to improve their presence and visibility on YouTube.
The traditional patient-physician relationship is being changed by the patients' searches for medical information on the Internet and in social media (SM). Freely available medical information online bears enormous potential but also holds dangers. In this crosssectional, questionnaire-based study, the patients' motivation, preferences and unmet needs when searching for medical information online and the impact on the patientphysician relationship were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients, χ 2-tests and paired t-tests. Among 460 participants, 82.4% had already used the Internet/SM to gain medical information, but in only 9.4% their dermatologists had raised this topic. Online search for medical information was associated with female gender (P = .048), a higher skin-related burden (P = .020), higher level of education (P = .072), higher income (P = .019), anxiety (P = .004), and adnexal skin diseases (P = .043). For 16.1% of patients, "the Internet/SM" was their most important source of medical information; 81.4% deemed the impact of their online searches on their patient-physician relationship as neutral, 16.0% as positive, 2.6% as negative. The patients' top three unmet needs were "Online consultations", "Professional content on YouTube" and "Chat opportunities". Online search for medical information is a very important topic for most dermatology patients but it may not be adequately addressed by dermatologists. Our results indicate that from the patients`perspective such online searches do not have a significant impact on patient-physician relationship.
Background/Aims: Topical corticosteroid concerns (TCC) are an important issue in patients with atopic dermatitis, leading to non-adherence with poor disease control and increased health care costs. However, neither the prevalence of TCC in a more comprehensible dermatological population nor the impact of patient information on topical corticosteroids given by clinicians is known. Therefore, we assessed the prevalence, characteristics, and sources of TCC in a dermatological population and the impact of written and oral patient information on TCC. Methods: A total of 643 outpatients with various skin diseases answered a 12-item questionnaire while waiting for the doctor's visit. Patients with TCC quantified their concerns on a discrete visual analogue scale before and after patient information, which consisted of written and oral information about topical corticosteroids (TCS) given by dermatologists. Results: The prevalence of TCC was 41.5%, and that of TCC-related non-adherence was 28.3%. TCC was positively associated with age <60 years, female gender, use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and non-physician health care profession. The leading concerns were skin atrophy, systemic effects, and impairment of the immune system. The most frequent sources of TCC were negative reports by media, family, or friends. Both written and oral patient information significantly reduced TCC. The number needed to benefit from patient information was approximately 2. Non-responders were more often female, TCS-inexperienced, and users of CAM with an intermediate level of education. Conclusions: TCC are highly prevalent in dermatological patients. Patient information may lower TCC in almost every second patient.
Bromelain is used for treatment of inflammatory diseases since decades. However, the exact mechanism of action remains poorly understood. While in vitro investigations have shown conflicting effects on the release of various cytokines, no in vivo data were available.In this study, the effects on inflammation-related cytokines of two doses of bromelain were tested in a single dose placebo-controlled 3 x crossover randomised clinical trial. Cytokine circadian profiles were used to investigate the effects of bromelain on the human immune system by using stimulated whole-blood leukocytes.The effects seen in these cultures demonstrated a significant shift in the circadian profiles of the Th1 cell mediator IFNγ (p<0.043) after bromelain 3000 F.I.P., and trends in those of the Th2-type cytokine IL-5 as well as the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. This suggests a general effect on the antigen-specific (T cell) compartment of the human immune system. Conclusion:This is the first time that bromelain was shown to modulate the cellular responses of lymphocyte after oral use. It is postulated that the immunomodulating effect of bromelain observed in this trial is part of its known anti-inflammatory activities. Further investigations will be necessary to verify the relevance of these findings to a diseased immune system.
Apart from lymphocytes, mononuclear phagocytes play an essential role as target cells for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Circulating blood monocytes (MOs) and tissue macrophages (Mφ) may harbor and distribute the virus throughout the body. In addition, proinflammatory monokines [interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] may contribute to the pathogenesis of HIV-mediated diseases. We have established a culture system on hydrophobic Teflon membranes for blood-borne MOs/Mφ. Both freshly isolated MOs as well as MO-derived Mφ could be infected with a monocytotropic HIV-1 isolate (HIV-1d117III) derived from a perinatally infected child. The virus production monitored by assay for viral antigen in cell-free supernatant is continuous for several weeks. We analyzed the stimulus response and the secretory repertoire of MOs/Mφ early after infection with HIV as well as in long-term cultured, virus-replicating cells. Infected MOs/Mφ respond to interferon-γ more effectively than control cells as estimated from the release of neopterin. The response to lipopolysaccharide was regulated differently: whereas the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α were up-regulated and even constitutively secreted upon infection, the production of the hematopoietin macrophage-colony-stimulating factor decreased. High levels of TNF-α and IL-1 might augment the infectibility of Mφ by HIV in an autocrine manner. Our results may provide some explanation for the immunologic dysfuntion, the hematopoietic failure and the chronic inflammatory disease occurring in HIV-infected patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.