1968
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1968.tb00535.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Transitions From Perceptual to Conceptual Learning

Abstract: Lindahl, M.‐B. On transitions from perceptual to conceptual learning. Scand. J. Psychol., 1968, 9, 206–214.—In a classification problem subjects showed to prefer perceptually determined solutions to conceptually determined ones, although both types were objectively possible and equally rewarding. With decreasing saliency of defining attributes increasing numbers of subjects adopted conceptually determined solutions, however. The results were discussed in relation to a non‐formal information‐processing mo del a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinction between analytical and intuitive functioning is relevant also in the case of learning. Lindahl (1964Lindahl ( , 1968Lindahl ( , 1970 has given interesting demonstrations implying that subjects seem to prefer intuitive functioning, if such functioning is possible, and that certain experimental manipulations may cause the subjects to change to an analytical level.…”
Section: Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between analytical and intuitive functioning is relevant also in the case of learning. Lindahl (1964Lindahl ( , 1968Lindahl ( , 1970 has given interesting demonstrations implying that subjects seem to prefer intuitive functioning, if such functioning is possible, and that certain experimental manipulations may cause the subjects to change to an analytical level.…”
Section: Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the above arguments were accepted as granting reasonable reliability to the subject's answers their seeming unawareness in the present case may be attributed to a lacking verbalizability of the awarenesses of relationships similar to or equal to those specified by the non-general principle. This attribution is not convincing in principle, however, since comparable subjects of previous studies mostly invoked exactly such relationships when attempting to solve the present prediction task (see for instance Lindahl, 1968). It is thought to be of relevance in one specific way, however, namely as follows.…”
Section: Delimitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previous results (Lindahl, 1968;1971) showed that subjects reported applying (1) some variant of the general principle, o r (2) weighing procedures developed on experiential o r intuitive basis (distance-and ribbon differences were for instance said to be weighed against each other in a way that was difficult to specify), or (3) some nongeneral principles. Subjects of category (1) were thought to solve the problem mainly deductively and were said to apply a deductive strategy.…”
Section: Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%