2018
DOI: 10.1111/iere.12315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Welfare Effects of Credit Arrangements

Abstract: This article studies the welfare effects of credit arrangements and how these effects depend on the trading mechanism and inflation. In a competitive market, credit arrangements can be welfare reducing, because high consumption by credit users drives up the price level, reducing consumption by money users who are subject to a binding liquidity constraint. By adopting an optimal trading mechanism, however, these welfare implications can be overturned. Both price discrimination and nonlinear pricing are essentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drop in consumption occurs because the increase in labor effort due to banks hiring raises marginal cost of labor ( c is convex), hence increasing the price of market‐1 consumption. This is similar to the pricing externality through the marginal cost channel in Chiu, Dong, and Shao (). However, as i keeps rising, consumption in the monetary equilibrium drops below consumption in the banking equilibrium.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The drop in consumption occurs because the increase in labor effort due to banks hiring raises marginal cost of labor ( c is convex), hence increasing the price of market‐1 consumption. This is similar to the pricing externality through the marginal cost channel in Chiu, Dong, and Shao (). However, as i keeps rising, consumption in the monetary equilibrium drops below consumption in the banking equilibrium.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Welfare is higher without banks if: truerightαu(q0)(1α)c(N0)>αu(q1)(1α)c(N1).If q1q0, then banks clearly reduce welfare since agents do not consume more but work more, since N1>N0. If, instead, q1>q0, then the curvature of the cost function c matters since N1>N0 and therefore it is the marginal cost that matters here—a finding that is similar to the one presented in Chiu, Dong, and Shao (). Here, welfare with banks is below welfare without banks if the additional utility (generated by the extra consumption q1q0) is less than the additional cost associated with the extra labor effort N1N0.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Berentsen et al (2014),Chiu et al (2018), and Rojas Breu (2013) get similar pecuniary externalities when agents have differing abilities to pay for goods. However, at the ZLB the pecuniary externality disappears in their models whereas that is not the case in our environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%