2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1603.07436
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the value-distribution of the difference between logarithms of two symmetric power $L$-functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their approach is based on [10] rather than on [11], though the employed techniques are remarkably close to the ones we apply in §5. The results of Matsumoto and Umegaki are complementary to ours, since the case of Sym 1 f = f, which is the main subject of our paper, could not be treated in [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their approach is based on [10] rather than on [11], though the employed techniques are remarkably close to the ones we apply in §5. The results of Matsumoto and Umegaki are complementary to ours, since the case of Sym 1 f = f, which is the main subject of our paper, could not be treated in [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Finally, let us quote a still more recent preprint by K. Matsumoto and Y. Umegaki [26] that treats similar questions for differences of logarithms of two symmetric power L-functions under the assumption of the GRH. Their approach is based on [10] rather than on [11], though the employed techniques are remarkably close to the ones we apply in §5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the condition for σ was weakened to σ > 1/2 unconditionally under some revisions of the meanings of averages and restrictions for a class of test functions [9,10,12]. Today there are several variations of the results of Ihara-Matsumoto studied by Ihara-Matsumoto [11], Lebacque-Zykin [16], Matsumoto-Umegaki [21], and Mourtada-Murty [23], however, a generalization of the case (C) to an arbitrary number field is not known by a technical difficulty as well as the formula (1.2). We solve such difficulties by the method of Guo [4] below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%