2018
DOI: 10.17323/1609-4514-2018-18-3-437-472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On M-Functions Associated with Modular Forms

Abstract: Let f be a primitive cusp form of weight k and level N, let χ be a Dirichlet character of conductor coprime with N, and let L(f ⊗ χ, s) denote either log L(f ⊗ χ, s) or (L ′ /L)(f ⊗ χ, s). In this article we study the distribution of the values of L when either χ or f vary. First, for a quasi-character ψ : C → C × we find the limit for the average Avg χ ψ(L(f ⊗ χ, s)), when f is fixed and χ varies through the set of characters with prime conductor that tends to infinity. Second, we prove an equidistribution re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, various analogues of Theorem 2.1 were discovered by Mourtada and Murty [35], Akbary and Hamieh [1], Lebacque and Zykin [24], Matsumoto and Umegaki [29], Mine [32] [33] [34], and so on.…”
Section: The Theory Of M-functions and The Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, various analogues of Theorem 2.1 were discovered by Mourtada and Murty [35], Akbary and Hamieh [1], Lebacque and Zykin [24], Matsumoto and Umegaki [29], Mine [32] [33] [34], and so on.…”
Section: The Theory Of M-functions and The Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More difficult is the case of the level aspect. So far there are two attempts in this direction, the aforementioned paper of Lebacque and Zykin [22], and an article of the authors [27]. Here we briefly mention the results proved in [27].…”
Section: The Value-distribution Of Automorphic L-functions (The Modulmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(The theorem is shown only for µ ≥ 3.) Lebacque and Zykin [22] studied log L(f, s) and (L ′ /L)(f, s) along the line of [13], and obtained a result analogous to [13,Theorem 1]. However their argument also does not arrive at the limit theorem for log L(f, s) or (L ′ /L)(f, s) of the form (3.1) or (3.4).…”
Section: The Value-distribution Of Automorphic L-functions (The Modulmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies were based on the result of Conrey-Duke-Farmer [6] or Serre [24] on the distribution of the eigenvalues of Hecke operators. On the other hand, Lebacque-Zykin [19] and Matsumoto-Umegaki [21] obtained analogues of Theorem 1.1 for L(s, f ) by adapting the Petersson formula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%