Proceedings Euromicro Symposium on Digital Systems Design
DOI: 10.1109/dsd.2001.952308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of mutations in Boolean minimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] [21] [22] [23]. The FC-Min Boolean minimizer was introduced by Fišer and Kubátová in[24]; later, it was combined with the BOOM algorithm as the BOOM-II Boolean minimizer[25] [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] [21] [22] [23]. The FC-Min Boolean minimizer was introduced by Fišer and Kubátová in[24]; later, it was combined with the BOOM algorithm as the BOOM-II Boolean minimizer[25] [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to it, for multi-output functions the primes are reduced into group implicants and then the group CP is solved. More details concerning these procedures can be found in [2,4].…”
Section: Principles Of the Boom Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggested partitioning algorithm is based on the BOOM minimization tool presented earlier [1][2][3][4][5]. It consists of two major phases: generation of implicants (prime implicants for single-output functions, group implicants for multi-output functions) and the subsequent solution of the covering problem (CP).…”
Section: Principles Of the Boom Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%