2016 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/mlsp.2016.7738903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of gradient information in Gaussian process quadratures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that the beginning of renewed interest in Bayesian cubature can be dated to 2012, a year that witnessed the publication of a number of articles (Huszár and Duvenaud, 2012;Osborne et al, 2012b,a). The outpouring of work that soon followed contained contributions, to name a few, on selection of the integration points by numerical optimisation (Briol et al, 2015), convergence results in the misspecified setting when f ∉ H K (Kanagawa et al, 2016), selection of the sampling distribution in Bayesian Monte Carlo (Briol et al, 2017), relationship between Bayesian cubature and random feature expansions (Bach, 2017), and generalisations where also the measure μ is considered unknown (Oates et al, 2017b), derivative evaluations are employed (Prüher and Särkkä, 2016;Wu et al, 2018), 4 and the integrand is allowed to be vector-valued (Xi et al, 2018). Other recent works are Hamrick and Griffiths (2013); Ma et al (2014) A topic that has seen a fair amount of activity is modelling of positivity of the integrand (Osborne et al, 2012a;Gunter et al, 2014;Chai and Garnett, 2018;Wagstaff et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that the beginning of renewed interest in Bayesian cubature can be dated to 2012, a year that witnessed the publication of a number of articles (Huszár and Duvenaud, 2012;Osborne et al, 2012b,a). The outpouring of work that soon followed contained contributions, to name a few, on selection of the integration points by numerical optimisation (Briol et al, 2015), convergence results in the misspecified setting when f ∉ H K (Kanagawa et al, 2016), selection of the sampling distribution in Bayesian Monte Carlo (Briol et al, 2017), relationship between Bayesian cubature and random feature expansions (Bach, 2017), and generalisations where also the measure μ is considered unknown (Oates et al, 2017b), derivative evaluations are employed (Prüher and Särkkä, 2016;Wu et al, 2018), 4 and the integrand is allowed to be vector-valued (Xi et al, 2018). Other recent works are Hamrick and Griffiths (2013); Ma et al (2014) A topic that has seen a fair amount of activity is modelling of positivity of the integrand (Osborne et al, 2012a;Gunter et al, 2014;Chai and Garnett, 2018;Wagstaff et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibers are modeled as linear elastic with properties E = 74 000 MPa and ν = 0.2. For the matrix we employ the pressure-dependent elastoplastic model proposed by Melro et al [43], with E = 3130 MPa, ν = 0.37, ν p = 0.32 (plastic Poisson's ratio) and yield stresses given by: σ t = 64.80 − 33.6e −ε p eq /0.003407 − 10.21e −ε p eq /0.06493 (39) σ c = 81.00 − 42.0e −ε p eq /0.003407 − 12.77e −ε p eq /0.06493 (40) where ε p eq is the equivalent plastic strain. The model is solved for 100 load steps, at which point the global macroscopic response is almost perfectly plastic and the strain localizes around the center of the specimen.…”
Section: Fe 2 Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Podgórski et al (2015) used a Slepian model to describe vehicle movements on a non-Gaussian road. Gradient information in Gaussian processes regression is still another example, (Prüher and Särkkä, 2016).…”
Section: Slepian Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%