2020
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2019.2944544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of Electromagnetic Inversion for Metasurface Design

Abstract: We show that the use of the electromagnetic inverse source framework offers great flexibility in the design of metasurfaces. In particular, this approach is advantageous for antenna design applications where the goal is often to satisfy a set of performance criteria such as half power beamwidths and null directions, rather than satisfying a fully-known complex field. In addition, the inverse source formulation allows the metasurface and the region over which the desired field specifications are provided to be … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, C 1 (x) is minimized without the LPC constraint using the conjugate gradient method as described in more detail in [12]. This provides an estimate for x that satisfies the field constraints and Love's condition prior to applying the LPC constraint.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, C 1 (x) is minimized without the LPC constraint using the conjugate gradient method as described in more detail in [12]. This provides an estimate for x that satisfies the field constraints and Love's condition prior to applying the LPC constraint.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of the procedure presented in Section II and [12] is that the synthesized susceptibilities may require (undesirable) loss and/or gain. To overcome this limitation, we first note that a necessary condition for a passive and lossless metasurface is that the input and output fields must satisfy LPC [15], [16].…”
Section: Enforcing Local Power Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview of the steps involved in the inversion approach is shown in Figure 1. First, we minimize a cost functional that quantifies the difference between the desired data and simulated data due to a set of equivalent electric and magnetic currents J and M [7]. The currents found from this stage are used as the initial guess for the second optimization stage that takes the incident field into consideration and uses particle swarm optimization (PSO) to enforce local power conservation (LPC), a necessary condition for a passive and lossless metasurface [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metasurfaces can facilitate the systematic control of electromagnetic fields with numerous applications reported in the past decade [1]- [5]. Recently, the electromagnetic inversion framework has been proposed as a design tool to determine a homogenized metasurface model [6], [7]. The main advantage of this framework lies in its ability to work with a variety of desired specifications given on arbitrary specification domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currents found from this stage are used as the initial guess for the second optimization stage that takes the incident field into consideration and uses particle swarm optimization (PSO) to enforce local power conservation (LPC), a necessary condition for a passive and lossless metasurface [8]. The currents found in the second stage are then used to compute the transmitted fields on the output side of the metasurface, assuming Love's equivalence condition was enforced [7]. The final stage consists of computing the surface susceptibilities (χ ee , χ em , χ mm , χ me ) from the generalized sheet transition conditions (GSTCs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%