2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of data from commercial NOx analyzers for air pollution studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among our pollutant concentration data sets, the Street View data set included only measurements that were taken during the daytime and on weekdays and may not, therefore, have fully captured long-term annual averages. The LUR data set incorporates in situ data, although concentrations are ultimately estimations of the sum of all oxidized atmospheric odd-nitrogen species (NO y ) estimations and not observations of actual NO 2 concentrations (Dickerson et al 2019). Future work can make use of more spatially refined estimates of PM 2:5 (Di et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among our pollutant concentration data sets, the Street View data set included only measurements that were taken during the daytime and on weekdays and may not, therefore, have fully captured long-term annual averages. The LUR data set incorporates in situ data, although concentrations are ultimately estimations of the sum of all oxidized atmospheric odd-nitrogen species (NO y ) estimations and not observations of actual NO 2 concentrations (Dickerson et al 2019). Future work can make use of more spatially refined estimates of PM 2:5 (Di et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While comparing modeled concentration to observation is the most common and practical way of evaluating emissions inventory, this comparison also should be done with caution because it can give misleading guidance on pollution control policy [74]. Potential sources of uncertainty, including the measuring interference of commercial instrument [74], satellite retrieval error [75], model resolution, changed NO:NO 2 ratios due to diesel vehicle emission control equipment [73], and modeled boundary layer should be carefully considered in the interpretation of NO x emissions inventory. This is an important issue in urban chemistry, because the magnitude and trend of NO x emissions are still controversial in scientific community [76][77][78][79][80].…”
Section: Discussion On Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molybdenum converter analyzer measures NO 2 indirectly by thermal conversion of NO 2 to NO using molybdenum and detection of NO by chemiluminescence that results from the reaction of NO with ozone. Since the reduction process could convert not only NO 2 but also other reactive nitrogen species, this instrument could overestimate NO 2 concentrations (Dunlea et al, 2007;Steinbacher et al, 2007;Lamsal et al, 2008;Dickerson et al, 2019). The magnitude of interference depends on the relative concentration of NO 2 , nitric acid, alkyl nitrates, and peroxy-acetyl nitrate, which vary spatially, diurnally, and seasonally, and is difficult to quantify.…”
Section: In Situ Surface No 2 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%