2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the tool wear behavior during ultrasonic vibration-assisted form grinding with alumina wheels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average chip length (L CGmax ) is 493 µm and the average width (W Cgmax ) is 25 µm under CG, while the average chip length (L UVAGmax ) is 164 µm and the average width (W UVAGmax ) is 11 µm under UVAG. Meanwhile, pro le grinding of UVAG is subjected to alternating grinding forces and the abrasive grains are susceptible to micro-breakage and maintain sharp, excellent form accuracy on formed surfaces consequently, as reported by Cao et al [35].…”
Section: Ground Surface and Chip Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The average chip length (L CGmax ) is 493 µm and the average width (W Cgmax ) is 25 µm under CG, while the average chip length (L UVAGmax ) is 164 µm and the average width (W UVAGmax ) is 11 µm under UVAG. Meanwhile, pro le grinding of UVAG is subjected to alternating grinding forces and the abrasive grains are susceptible to micro-breakage and maintain sharp, excellent form accuracy on formed surfaces consequently, as reported by Cao et al [35].…”
Section: Ground Surface and Chip Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…where μ d and σ d are the average value and standard deviation of protrusion height, σ d =102 μm [30]. In the study, the surface, where the average protrusion height located, is the circumferential surface of grinding wheel.…”
Section: Simulation Of Grinding Wheel Surface Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional grinding, the ultrasonic-assisted grinding effectively enhances the surface quality and material removal rate, and reduces the grinding force and tool wear [4,5]. Commonly, the machining quality of ultrasonic-assisted grinding is determined by the degree of wear of the grinding tools, and the decrease of workpiece surface quality and even grinding burn are mainly caused by the wear of grinding tools [1,6]. Effective monitoring of the wear behavior of grinding tools is helpful to enhance the surface quality of workpieces and the machining efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%