1998
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9612.00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Syntax of Subnominal Clitics: Cliticization and Ellipsis

Abstract: This article uses the properties of the French subnominal clitic en as a probe to explore various issues in current syntactic theory. Section 2 presents some of its chief properties; section 3 deals with the way they relate to the VP-internal hypothesis for subjects; section 4 discusses the intricate ways in which the null subject parameter interacts with the syntax of en/ne in French and Italian; section 5 analyzes the contrast between ''adnominal en'' -as in J'en ai lu le premier chapitre (I en-have read the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7 A first conceptual drawback is that the account relies on government, which the Minimalist Program tries to dispense with for reasons we will not go into here (see Chomsky 1993. It is true that the phenomena covered in such studies on ellipsis processes as Lobeck's and Zagona's still await a ''governmentfree,'' minimalist treatment, but recent work (Boeckx 1999, Depiante 2000, Pollock 1998) suggests that the crosslinguistic distribution of ellipsis might be derived from independent parametric options, without recourse to government.…”
Section: Inadequacies Of Lasnik's Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 A first conceptual drawback is that the account relies on government, which the Minimalist Program tries to dispense with for reasons we will not go into here (see Chomsky 1993. It is true that the phenomena covered in such studies on ellipsis processes as Lobeck's and Zagona's still await a ''governmentfree,'' minimalist treatment, but recent work (Boeckx 1999, Depiante 2000, Pollock 1998) suggests that the crosslinguistic distribution of ellipsis might be derived from independent parametric options, without recourse to government.…”
Section: Inadequacies Of Lasnik's Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See alsoKayne (1975),Pollock (1998), among others, for analyses of so-called partitive en in French.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even if we grant the contrast, it is not clear why it argues against the MTC. All we need to do is adopt Pollock's (1998) claim that en is a clitic heading a big DP, taking its NP associate as a complement. Since en is the head, it is the element that is -marked.…”
Section: Unaccusativementioning
confidence: 99%