2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-9477(03)00290-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the suitability of DD and HD models for the simulation of nanometer double-gate MOSFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the agreement between the characteristics obtained through Drift Diffusion model (with ATLAS default parameters) and the Monte Carlo (MC) results [24] are quite good for transistors down to 40 nm gate lengths. Thus, the conventional drift diffusion (DD) model is used, which happens to be less time consuming as well.…”
Section: Calibration Of Tfet Modelmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Moreover, the agreement between the characteristics obtained through Drift Diffusion model (with ATLAS default parameters) and the Monte Carlo (MC) results [24] are quite good for transistors down to 40 nm gate lengths. Thus, the conventional drift diffusion (DD) model is used, which happens to be less time consuming as well.…”
Section: Calibration Of Tfet Modelmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Following [26], Jankovic et al [27] have modified ATLAS default model parameter beta and vsat.n by setting beta=1 and …”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DD model is the simplest and computationally most efficient approach but neglects nonstationary carrier transport and underestimates the on-currents of short-gate MOSFETs relative to experiments [5] and MC simulations [6,7]. The HD model takes nonstationary carrier transport effects into account by assuming that the carrier velocity depends on the local carrier temperature (i.e., on the local carrier energy) but tends to overestimate velocity overshoot and drain currents [6][7][8][9]. The MC method [6,7], which is based on an indirect solution of the Boltzmann transport equation, is frequently considered the most accurate approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HD model takes nonstationary carrier transport effects into account by assuming that the carrier velocity depends on the local carrier temperature (i.e., on the local carrier energy) but tends to overestimate velocity overshoot and drain currents [6][7][8][9]. The MC method [6,7], which is based on an indirect solution of the Boltzmann transport equation, is frequently considered the most accurate approach. The enhanced accuracy comes, however, at the expense of significantly enhanced computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation