KENNEDY, M. J. 1981. A revision of species of the genus Haematoloechus Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Haematoloechidae) from Canada and the United States. Can. J. Zool. 59: 1836-1846. Previous experimental and field studies have shown that variations within the genus Haematoloechus may result from differences in age and degree of maturity, extent of crowding, species of host, and other factors. Based on these observations, only 6 of the 15 previously known species from Canada and the United States are considered valid. The valid species and their synonyms are as follows: Haematoloechus longiplexus Stafford, 1902; H. breviplexus Stafford, 1902;H. varioplexus Stafford, 1902 (= H. pamiplexus, = H. buttensis, = H. similiplexus, = H.jloedae, and H. uniplexus); H. kernensis Ingles, 1932 (= H. tumidus); H. medioplexus Stafford, 1902; and H. complexus (Seely, 1906) (= H. coloradensis, = H. confusus, = H. oxyorchis). The existence of three species groups is hypothesized. Haematoloechus longiplexus and H. breviplexus constitute one group, characterized by little geographical variation and a narrow host range. They are typically parasites of Rana catesbeiana and R. clamitans. Haematoloechus varioplexus and H. kernensis constitute the second group. These species have a wider host range and greater variation in characters purported to be specific differences. The third group includes those lung flukes which do not contain extracaecal loops (H. medioplexus and H. complexus). Of these, only H. medioplexus had little geographical variation and was found to occur in a single frog host. KENNEDY, M. J. 1981. A revision of species of the genus Haematoloechus Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Haematoloechidae) from Canada and the United States. Can. J. Zool. 59: 1836-1846. Des Ctudes prkalables en laboratoire et en nature ont dCmontrC que les variations obsew6es chez le genre Haematoloechus peuvent rCsulter de differences d'ige, de degrC de maturitk, de densitk, du statut sp6cifique de l'hdte et d'autres facteurs. D'aprks ces observations, seulement six des quinze es@ces connues du Canadaet des Etats-Unis sont valides. Voici la liste des es@ces valides et de leurs synonymes: