2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2013
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2013.6566874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the steady-state of cache networks

Abstract: Abstract-A shift has recently begun taking place regarding the manner in which researchers are thinking about networking in the Internet. In addition to the traditional host-to-host communication that has endured for more than four decades, many researchers have begun to focus on Content Networking -a networking model in which host-to-content interaction is the norm. A central component of such an architecture is a large-scale interconnected caching system. To date, very little is understood about the way thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This abstract problem naturally captures-and is directly motivated by-several important real-life networking applications. These include content and information-centric networks (CCNs/ICNs) [22,32,33], core and edge content delivery networks (CDNs) [7,13], micro/femtocell networks [34], and peer-to-peer networks [28], to name a few. For example, in hierarchical CDNs, requests for content can be served by intermediate caches placed at the network's edge, e.g., within the same administrative domain (e.g., AS or ISP) as the originator of the request; if, however, content is not cached locally, the request can be forwarded to a core server, that acts as a cache of last resort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This abstract problem naturally captures-and is directly motivated by-several important real-life networking applications. These include content and information-centric networks (CCNs/ICNs) [22,32,33], core and edge content delivery networks (CDNs) [7,13], micro/femtocell networks [34], and peer-to-peer networks [28], to name a few. For example, in hierarchical CDNs, requests for content can be served by intermediate caches placed at the network's edge, e.g., within the same administrative domain (e.g., AS or ISP) as the originator of the request; if, however, content is not cached locally, the request can be forwarded to a core server, that acts as a cache of last resort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works characterize the content dynamics in a single cache or caching network by Markov chain [65,69,75,83,84].…”
Section: Modeling Behavior and Performance Analysis Of Caching Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [83], a cache network is modeled as a discrete-time Markov chain with state space Ω 0 , in which the content inserted or evicted from one of the cache nodes would cause the state transition of the system. Supposing that the network has m cache nodes, each cache space is N and the total number of contents is n. The system state is s, s = (s [1] In [65], the work process of LRU replacement policy is modeled as a homogeneous Markov chain.…”
Section: Modeling Behavior and Performance Analysis Of Caching Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], [7] the authors use probabilistic caching to increase the cache hit rate and the fairness among content flows in a network of caches. The authors in [29] analyzed the impact of the initial system state on the selection of the system's steady-state. These works consider that the caches route requests irrespective of the associated traffic costs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%