1992
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1992.2713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the solidification of Al62Cu20Co15Si3 and Al61Cu19.5Co14.5Si5 alloys

Abstract: The solidification behavior of Al62Cu20Co15Si3 and Al61Cu19.5Co14.5Si5 alloys was studied by means of optical metallography, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, energy-dispersive x-ray analysis, powder x-ray diffraction, and differential thermal analysis. Slowly as well as rapidly cooled ingots of both alloys contained a decagonal quasicrystalline phase as the dominant phase with, additionally, several minor crystalline phases. The structure of the rapidly solidified Si-containing alloys was similar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reflection was originated in the cubic τ-phase and identified in Ref. [9] as 100 reflection (the remaining reflections of the τ phase agree with the reflections of the decagonal phase).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reflection was originated in the cubic τ-phase and identified in Ref. [9] as 100 reflection (the remaining reflections of the τ phase agree with the reflections of the decagonal phase).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This peak, of interplanar distance d = 0.29 nm, identified in Ref. [9] as 100 reflection, corresponds to the τ phase. Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A stability range of the d-phase 973 < T < 1350 K was found as well as a higher thermal expansion for the quasiperiodic plane than for the periodic direction. Some of the results of these authors were differently interpreted by Grushko, Wittmann, Urban (1992). The SAED patterns of an Al 62 Co 14 Cu 24 alloy annealed 1290 h at 700 C and 3500 h at 550 C were differed significantly from each other (Grushko, 1993c).…”
Section: X-ray and Neutron Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Figure 2b presents the back-scattering electron image of the composite layer, which was cut as a microsection parallel to the ZY plane. The cross-sections of the fibres with irregular (F 1 −F [12,14], tetragonal Θ phase (stoichiometric formula Al 2 Cu) [11,12] and regular β phase (stoichiometric formula Al(Cu,Co)) [11][12][13]. The nomenclature of phases used above complies with [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average errors in the estimated chemical composition was about 0.5 at% for Al and about 0.3 at% for Cu and Co. Figure 3 shows an example of the X-ray diffraction pattern of the material of the composite layer. From the calculated interplanar distances the following phases were identified: the D phase [11], the T phase [11,15,16], the Θ phase [17] and the β phase [18]. The electron diffraction pattern (insert in fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%