2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010ja016174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the simultaneity of substorm onset between two hemispheres

Abstract: International audience[1] Simultaneous observations of auroral kilometric radiation from the Northern and Southern Hemispheres showed some cases in which the buildup of field‐aligned acceleration occurred only in one hemisphere at the substorm onset. This indicates that a substorm does not always complete the current system by connecting the cross‐tail current with both northern and southern ionospheric currents. Conjugate auroral observations showed that in one case, the auroral breakup in the Northern and So… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter effect was interpreted as being driven by the solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) fluxes with maxima around the solstices because of Earth's axial tilt of 23.4°. A north‐south asymmetry was also reported in the time difference between northern and southern AKR breakup during the substorm onset [ Morioka et al , ]. The primary breakup of the AKR during substorms occurred as a “one‐sided” breakup in the Northern (summer) Hemisphere without the southern (winter) breakup, followed by a secondary simultaneous breakup in the Northern and Southern hemispheres ∼ 10 min later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter effect was interpreted as being driven by the solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) fluxes with maxima around the solstices because of Earth's axial tilt of 23.4°. A north‐south asymmetry was also reported in the time difference between northern and southern AKR breakup during the substorm onset [ Morioka et al , ]. The primary breakup of the AKR during substorms occurred as a “one‐sided” breakup in the Northern (summer) Hemisphere without the southern (winter) breakup, followed by a secondary simultaneous breakup in the Northern and Southern hemispheres ∼ 10 min later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The height distribution of the SKR source location was deduced from the SKR spectra with reference to the terrestrial studies by Morioka et al [, , , , ]. Referring to the validations by previous studies based on remote and in situ measurements in the SKR sources [ Cecconi et al , ; Lamy et al , ; Lamy et al , , ; Mutel et al , ; Menietti et al , ], we assumed the SKR emissions are predominately right‐handed extraordinary (R‐X) mode waves excited via the CMI process [ Wu and Lee , ].…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another often overlooked point of complexity concerns the role of the ionosphere. Recent and past conjugate observations reveal breakup timing differences on the order of a few minutes at opposite hemispheres [e.g., Morioka et al , 2011]. These differences suggest that the auroral ionosphere may partly control auroral breakup timing.…”
Section: Substorm Onset Timing and Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar time difference between both stations was seen in the transition into the larger-scale spiral forms (not shown), as well as the onsets of Pi1-Pi2 power. Such a hemispheric difference might be a reflection of differences in the acceleration of precipitating auroral particles [e.g., Morioka et al, 2011], as well as the background conditions mentioned above, although it is inconclusive without further study.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although spatial and temporal evolution of aurora is generally perceived to be similar in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, the optical signatures often represent interhemispheric asymmetries in terms of the timing, location, and intensity. A few simultaneous optical observations of auroral substorms in both hemispheres [ Frank and Sigwarth , ; Morioka et al ., ], which have been very rare, indicated that the onset brightening of auroral substorm in one hemisphere precedes that in another hemisphere by ~1–2 min. Such a nonsimultaneous nature of interhemispheric auroral substorm onsets potentially suggested that the processes creating aurora operate independently in each hemisphere, presumably in/around the auroral acceleration region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%