A key process in the interaction of magnetospheres with the solar wind is the explosive release of energy stored in the magnetotail. Based on observational evidence, magnetic reconnection is widely believed to be responsible. However, the very possibility of spontaneous reconnection in collisionless magnetotail plasmas has been questioned in kinetic theory for more than three decades. In addition, in situ observations by multispacecraft missions (e.g., THEMIS) reveal the development of buoyancy and flapping motions coexisting with reconnection. Never before have kinetic simulations reproduced all three primary modes in realistic 2‐D configurations with a finite normal magnetic field. Moreover, 3‐D simulations with closed boundaries suggest that the tail activity is dominated by buoyancy‐driven instabilities, whereas reconnection is a secondary effect strongly localized in the dawn‐dusk direction. In this paper, we use massively parallel 3‐D fully kinetic simulations with open boundaries to show that sufficiently far from the planet explosive processes in the tail are dominated by reconnection motions. These motions occur in the form of spontaneously generated dipolarization fronts accompanied by changes in magnetic topology which extend in the dawn‐dusk direction over the size of the simulation box, suggesting that reconnection onset causes a macroscale reconfiguration of the real magnetotail. In our simulations, buoyancy and flapping motions significantly disturb the primary dipolarization front but neither destroy it nor change the near 2‐D picture of the front evolution critically. Consistent with recent multiprobe observations, dipolarization fronts are also found to be the main regions of energy conversion in the magnetotail.
Auroral beads, i.e., azimuthally arrayed bright spots resembling a pearl necklace, have recently drawn attention as a possible precursor of auroral substorms. We used simultaneous, ground‐based, all‐sky camera observations from a geomagnetically conjugate Iceland‐Syowa Station pair to demonstrate that the auroral beads, whose wavelength is ∼30–50 km, evolve synchronously in the northern and southern hemispheres and have remarkable interhemispheric similarities. In both hemispheres: 1) they appeared almost at the same time; 2) their longitudinal wave number was similar ∼300–400, corresponding bead separation being ∼1° in longitude; 3) they started developing into a larger scale spiral form at the same time; 4) their propagation speeds and their temporal evolution were almost identical. These interhemispheric similarities provide strong evidence that there is a common driver in the magnetotail equatorial region that controls the major temporal evolution of the auroral beads; thus, the magnetosphere plays a primary role in structuring the initial brightening arc in this scale size.
Substorm-type evolution of the Earth's magnetosphere is investigated by mining more than two decades of spaceborne magnetometer data from multiple missions including the first two years (2016)(2017) of the Magnetospheric MultiScale mission. This investigation reveals interesting features of plasma evolution distinct from ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) behavior: X-lines, thin current sheets, and regions with the tailward gradient of the equatorial magnetic field B z . X-lines are found to form mainly beyond 20 R E , but for strong driving, with the solar wind electric field exceeding ∼ 5mV/m, they may come closer. For substorms with weaker driving, X-lines may be preceded by redistribution of the magnetic flux in the tailward B z gradient regions, similar to the magnetic flux release instability discovered earlier in PIC and MHD simulations as a precursor mechanism of the reconnection onset. Current sheets in the growth phase may be as thin as 0.2 R E , comparable to the thermal ions gyroradius, and at the same time, as long as 15 R E . Such an aspect ratio is inconsistent with the isotropic force balance for observed magnetic field configurations. These findings can help resolve kinetic mechanisms of substorm dipolarizations and adjust kinetic generalizations of global MHD models of the magnetosphere. They can also guide and complement microscale analysis of nonideal effects. Plain Language SummaryThe sun emits a steam of charged particles called the solar wind that flows past the Earth interacting with the planet's dipole magnetic field. This stretches the dipolar magnetic field away from the sun on the nightside of the planet storing energy in the stretched field. Once every few hours, this stretched configuration suddenly becomes more dipolar bringing particles and magnetic flux closer to the planet and powering aurora in the polar regions. During these processes, termed substorms, the gas of charged particles, protons, and electrons trapped by the dipole and known as plasma, behaves largely as a perfectly conducting fluid. However, only deviations from this ideal conducting plasma behavior can explain the substorm mechanisms. We mine two decades of spacecraft magnetometer data from multiple missions to form swarms of thousands of synthetic probes. They help reveal effects of nonideal plasma evolution during substorms, which cannot be captured by direct in situ observations because of their extreme paucity.However, more than half a century ago, while examining the magnetospheric convection cycle, Dungey (1961) concluded that there are regions with topological singularities of the magnetic field, where ideal MHD
Modes and manifestations of the explosive activity in the Earth’s magnetotail, as well as its onset mechanisms and key pre-onset conditions are reviewed. Two mechanisms for the generation of the pre-onset current sheet are discussed, namely magnetic flux addition to the tail lobes, or other high-latitude perturbations, and magnetic flux evacuation from the near-Earth tail associated with dayside reconnection. Reconnection onset may require stretching and thinning of the sheet down to electron scales. It may also start in thicker sheets in regions with a tailward gradient of the equatorial magnetic field ; in this case it begins as an ideal-MHD instability followed by the generation of bursty bulk flows and dipolarization fronts. Indeed, remote sensing and global MHD modeling show the formation of tail regions with increased , prone to magnetic reconnection, ballooning/interchange and flapping instabilities. While interchange instability may also develop in such thicker sheets, it may grow more slowly compared to tearing and cause secondary reconnection locally in the dawn-dusk direction. Post-onset transients include bursty flows and dipolarization fronts, micro-instabilities of lower-hybrid-drift and whistler waves, as well as damped global flux tube oscillations in the near-Earth region. They convert the stretched tail magnetic field energy into bulk plasma acceleration and collisionless heating, excitation of a broad spectrum of plasma waves, and collisional dissipation in the ionosphere. Collisionless heating involves ion reflection from fronts, Fermi, betatron as well as other, non-adiabatic, mechanisms. Ionospheric manifestations of some of these magnetotail phenomena are discussed. Explosive plasma phenomena observed in the laboratory, the solar corona and solar wind are also discussed.
[1] On 28 February 1998, four quasi-periodic pressure pulses with an amplitude of a few nPa detected by ACE gave rise to periodic compressions of the magnetosphere with period of about 14 min. In concert with periodic compressed and expanded states of the magnetosphere forced directly by the pressure variation, a coherent geomagnetic field fluctuation with the same period appeared on a global scale and was recorded at stations located from polar to equatorial regions. Most ground-level geomagnetic field signatures on the dayside can be interpreted as the result of a global ionospheric current system, like the global Pc5 event examined by Motoba et al. [2002]. In the afternoon polar ionosphere covered with the dense magnetometer stations, a vortical current structure associated with pressure-induced field-aligned currents (FACs) is centered at 72°± 1°and consists of a counterclockwise (clockwise) vortex in response to positive (negative) changes of solar wind pressure oscillation. Although the vortical current signatures are unclear in the morning sector, each afternoon vortex could pair with the morning one with opposite rotation. During this event, the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) remained steady with a strong southward orientation (À10 nT or less). In addition to the pressureinduced FAC system, the steady southward IMF drives the dayside Region 1 (R1) current system, resulting in the familiar large-scale two-cell convection pattern in the ionosphere observed by SuperDARN radars. The SuperDARN convection patterns indicated that the ionospheric convection reversal boundary (CRB) in the afternoon was located in the range of 73°$ 77°N around 15 MLT. The ionospheric footprint of the pressure-induced FAC in the afternoon was found to be 1.5°± 1.1°$ 4.0°± 1.4°e quatorward of the CRB. This suggests that the pressure-induced FAC is started inside the R1 current system originating from the outer magnetospheric boundary layer. We argue that the paired FAC system responsible for the global geomagnetic fluctuations on the ground arises from the oscillatory large-scale dynamical convection originating well inside the closed field lines in direct response to the quasi-periodic pressure variations, not from the localized undulations on the magnetopause nor from global eigenmode oscillations of the magnetospheric cavity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.