2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the scaling up leaf stomatal resistance to canopy resistance using photosynthetic photon flux density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
2
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
85
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, crop ET is synthetically determined by a number of interacting environmental and biological processes (Allen et al, 1998;Ortega-Farias et al, 2006). Nowadays, one key scientific challenge in the determination of ET is to develop mathematical Due to the lack of independent estimates of G s , many researchers have assumed that G s was equivalent to the integrated leaf stomatal conductance, g s , weighted by leaf area and adjusted by the environmental variables (Campbell and Norman, 1998;Irmak et al, 2008). The g s at the single leaf-level is determined through the Jarvis or Ball-Berry type model, and then scaled-up to G s at the canopy level (Irmak et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, crop ET is synthetically determined by a number of interacting environmental and biological processes (Allen et al, 1998;Ortega-Farias et al, 2006). Nowadays, one key scientific challenge in the determination of ET is to develop mathematical Due to the lack of independent estimates of G s , many researchers have assumed that G s was equivalent to the integrated leaf stomatal conductance, g s , weighted by leaf area and adjusted by the environmental variables (Campbell and Norman, 1998;Irmak et al, 2008). The g s at the single leaf-level is determined through the Jarvis or Ball-Berry type model, and then scaled-up to G s at the canopy level (Irmak et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, one key scientific challenge in the determination of ET is to develop mathematical Due to the lack of independent estimates of G s , many researchers have assumed that G s was equivalent to the integrated leaf stomatal conductance, g s , weighted by leaf area and adjusted by the environmental variables (Campbell and Norman, 1998;Irmak et al, 2008). The g s at the single leaf-level is determined through the Jarvis or Ball-Berry type model, and then scaled-up to G s at the canopy level (Irmak et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2011b). Generally, the scaled-up G s is compared to G s derived by inverting the P-M equation when ET and the meteorological variables measured over the crop canopy were known inputs (Ortega-Farias et al, 2006;Rana et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40°34°N, 98°W, 552 m mean sea level (MSL)]. Detailed descriptions of field experimental procedures, data collection, and Bowen ratio energy balance measurements have been outlined in detail by , Irmak and Mutiibwa (2008), and Irmak et al (2008b). Some of the basic experimental practices will be described here.…”
Section: Study Site Seasons and Field Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second method is to make a one-step estimate of ET based on the Penman-Monteith (P-M) equation (Monteith, 1965), with crop-to-crop differences represented by the use of cropspecific values of surface and aerodynamic resistances (Shuttleworth, 2006). ET estimations using the one-step approach with the P-M model have been studied by several authors (Stannard, 1993;Farahani & Bausch, 1995;Rana et al, 1997;Alves & Pereira, 2000;Kjelgaard & Stockle, 2001;Ortega-Farias et al, 2004;Shuttleworth, 2006;Katerji & Rana, 2006;Flores, 2007;Irmak et al, 2008). Although different degrees of success have been achieved, the model has generally performed more satisfactorily when the leaf area index (LAI) is large (LAI>2).…”
Section: Et Modelling Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%