1990
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(90)90103-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-the-road measurements of automotive emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different studies have shown that when testing standard cycles on a dynamometer, the results are not representative of actual traffic dynamic conditions (Schurman and Staab 1990, Vlieger 1997, Kirchstetter et al 1999. This has been proved by the weak agreement between the results obtained from a dynamometer and on-road urban cycles (André andHammarström 2000, Joumard et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies have shown that when testing standard cycles on a dynamometer, the results are not representative of actual traffic dynamic conditions (Schurman and Staab 1990, Vlieger 1997, Kirchstetter et al 1999. This has been proved by the weak agreement between the results obtained from a dynamometer and on-road urban cycles (André andHammarström 2000, Joumard et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is because measurement and evaluation of the parameters which characterize automobile energy expenditure and exhaust emissions are traditionally performed as standardized procedures in an emission laboratory, the vehicle running on rollers in a chassis dynamometer. Studies from real traffic using on board measurement apparatus have been made at VW [2,3], at the Belgian research institute VlTO [4] and at GM, Michigan [10]. Warren Spring Laboratory in England used a proportional sampler in combination with a mini-CVS [11,12] Fuel flow metering -Fuel volume flows were registered by a Pierburg PLU 116H flow meter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the availability of this data has led to widespread use of these laboratory results to predict real-world pollutant levels using emission factor models such as EMFAC (California Air Resources Board) and MOBILE (U.S. EPA). Recent ®eld studies of actual emissions via tunnel studies (Pierson et al, 1990;McLaren et al, 1996), roadside point sampling, across-the-road remote sensing (Lawson et al, 1990;Bishop et al, 1993;Stephens, 1994;Stedman, 1996;Woods, 1996;Zhang et al, 1996), and instrumented vehicles (Schurmann and Staab, 1990;Kelly and Groblicki, 1993;Guenther et al, 1996) have noted the inadequacies of using laboratory data to estimate real-world pollutant levels. These inadequacies are generally attributed to factors such as the limitations of the test driving cycle, vehicle tampering, poor vehicle maintenance, and the high frequency of`o -cycle' driving events under actual driving conditions (Black, 1991;Ross, 1994).…”
Section: Quantifying Real-world Automobile Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While more recent research has focused on correlating driving mode with emissions (Hansen et al, 1995;Jensen, 1995;Joumard et al, 1995;Sjodin and Lenner, 1995;Barth et al, 1997;Washington et al, 1997;Young et al, 1997), emissions were usually estimated from emission models rather than measured directly in the ®eld. The few studies that have used on-board gas analyzers (Schurmann and Staab, 1990;Kelly and Groblicki, 1993;Guenther et al, 1996) demonstrated the capabilities of these instruments to measure second-by-second emission levels to aid in repair of malfunctioning emission systems, but made no e ort to correlate driving style and emission levels.…”
Section: Quantifying Real-world Automobile Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%