SAE Technical Paper Series 1998
DOI: 10.4271/980682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence Of Roof-Rack, Trailer Etc On Automobile Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions, Measured On-The-Road

Abstract: MA 01923forcopying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 ofthe U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale. SAE routinely stocks printed papers for a period of three years following date of publication. Direct your orders to SAE Customer Sales and Satisfaction Department. Quantity reprint rates can be obtained from the Customer Sales and Satis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The roof rack option resulted with a minor effect on the fuel economy by (1–3%) depending on vehicle parameters, e.g. added roof rack ~2% fuel economy for vehicle test with weight 1408 kg and the frontal area was 2.15 m 2 , which means around 4 Wh energy consumption is increased per a mile, if the on‐board PV module with roof rack option is installed in a vehicle with the original driving efficiency of 200 Wh/mile (see conclusion section for more discussion).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roof rack option resulted with a minor effect on the fuel economy by (1–3%) depending on vehicle parameters, e.g. added roof rack ~2% fuel economy for vehicle test with weight 1408 kg and the frontal area was 2.15 m 2 , which means around 4 Wh energy consumption is increased per a mile, if the on‐board PV module with roof rack option is installed in a vehicle with the original driving efficiency of 200 Wh/mile (see conclusion section for more discussion).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A roof rack is one of the most common and popular accessories on vehicles [12]. Installation of a roof rack can increase aerodynamic drag by increasing both the drag coefficient (Cd) and the projected frontal area (A).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Installation of a roof rack can increase aerodynamic drag by increasing both the drag coefficient (Cd) and the projected frontal area (A). Lenner [12] investigated the on-road impacts of roof racks for a 1992 Volvo 940 midsize sedan. The vehicle was equipped with an unloaded roof rack and driven at 43.5 mph, 49.7 mph, and 55.9 mph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mono-Si PV module thickness is around 4.6 mm, which is very minor compared to the vehicle frontal area (∼ 2.0 m 2 ). The roof rack option resulted with a minor effect on the fuel economy by (1-3%) depending on vehicle parameters, e.g., added roof rack ~2% fuel economy for vehicle test with weight 1408 kg and the frontal area was 2.15 m 2 [28], [29], which means around 4 Wh energy consumption is increased per a mile, if the on-board PV module with roof rack option is installed in a vehicle with the original driving efficiency of 200 Wh/mile. However, future works are needed to test the aerodynamic impacts for specific targeted vehicles.…”
Section: Effects Of Mounting On-board Pv On Vehicle Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%