2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8502(03)00005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the relevance of accounting for the evolution of the fractal dimension in aerosol process simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the ratio increased, the fractal dimension started to increase from 1.8 up to 2.6. This trend was similar to previous reports (Artelt et al 2003;Schmid et al 2004). Owing to the melting point of titania and the limitation of the initial particle size on the BD simulation, the fractal dimension of fully sintered agglomerates could not be obtained, unlike in the MC simulation (Schmid et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the ratio increased, the fractal dimension started to increase from 1.8 up to 2.6. This trend was similar to previous reports (Artelt et al 2003;Schmid et al 2004). Owing to the melting point of titania and the limitation of the initial particle size on the BD simulation, the fractal dimension of fully sintered agglomerates could not be obtained, unlike in the MC simulation (Schmid et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The coagulation coefficient (K) of agglomerates is very different from that of spherical particles, depending on their fractal dimension (Mulholland et al 1988;Matsoukas and Friedlander 1991;Rogak and Flagan 1992;Seinfeld and Pandis 1998). The fractal dimension can vary with respect to the ratio of the collision and sintering characteristic times (Artelt et al 2003). The relationship between the fractal dimension of agglomerates and the characteristic times of collision, sintering, and surface growth has been obtained by performing Monte Carlo (MC) simulations (Schmid et al 2004(Schmid et al , 2006Al Zaitone et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The varying fractal dimension method proposed by Artelt et al (2003) is used here as shown in Equation (10), in which D f is updated at each point based on the characteristic fusion time (t f ) and collision time (t c )…”
Section: Cfd Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It simplified the influence of fractal structure on the collision kernel, which is both an advantage and a disadvantage of this model. A more recent study (Artelt et al 2003) has shown that it is important to use non-constant fractal dimension for simultaneous coagulation and coalescence. That model incorporated the evolution of the mean value of the fractal dimension based on physical and process parameters, that is, a single fractal dimension was assumed to be valid for all particles at one instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence one may expect elevated local precursor concentrations and longer residence times within the temperature region relevant for particle formation. This favours surface growth, but also coagulation and sintering [29]. At p chamber,Ar = 100 mbar, this leads to enhanced primary particle growth and to the formation of compact aggregates, which do not contain more than a few primary particles with diameters of around 70 nm.…”
Section: Counter-and Injection Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%