2011
DOI: 10.1214/11-aos900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the range of validity of the autoregressive sieve bootstrap

Abstract: We explore the limits of the autoregressive (AR) sieve bootstrap, and show that its applicability extends well beyond the realm of linear time series as has been previously thought. In particular, for appropriate statistics, the AR-sieve bootstrap is valid for stationary processes possessing a general Wold-type autoregressive representation with respect to a white noise; in essence, this includes all stationary, purely nondeterministic processes, whose spectral density is everywhere positive. Our main theorem … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
154
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With caveats concerning invertibility, the Wold theorem therefore extends validity to the general covariance stationary case. The issues arising here are carefully analysed, in the bootstrap context, by Kreiss, Paparoditis, and Politis (2011). They show that Gaussianity of the series is certainly sufficient and this is, in any case, an assumption adopted for our subsequent asymptotic analysis and imposed in our experiments.…”
Section: The Bias-corrected Estimatormentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With caveats concerning invertibility, the Wold theorem therefore extends validity to the general covariance stationary case. The issues arising here are carefully analysed, in the bootstrap context, by Kreiss, Paparoditis, and Politis (2011). They show that Gaussianity of the series is certainly sufficient and this is, in any case, an assumption adopted for our subsequent asymptotic analysis and imposed in our experiments.…”
Section: The Bias-corrected Estimatormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Politis and Romano (1994) and the sieve autoregression method of Bühlmann (1997). Note that the latter calculation is also used to obtain expression [7], and the same remarks apply regarding the validity of the sieve AR method in this context; see Kreiss, Paparoditis, and Politis (2011). 2.…”
Section: The Bootstrap Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under very mild conditions and without having to assume any autoregressive structure of the underlying process, they were able to show that the AR sieve remains valid whenever the so-called companion process mimics the proper limiting distribution, which constitutes a simple and general check criterion. Recently, Meyer and Kreiss (2014+) extended the results of Kreiss, Paparoditis and Politis (2011) to the multivariate case. To generalize their concept, as a second main contribution of this paper, we introduce a spatial AR sieve methodology in the spirit of Kreiss, Paparoditis and Politis (2011) and provide rigorous theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while all the aforementioned results were derived under the explicit assumption of an underlying AR(∞) process, Kreiss, Paparoditis and Politis (2011) extended the range of applicability of the AR sieve significantly. Under very mild conditions and without having to assume any autoregressive structure of the underlying process, they were able to show that the AR sieve remains valid whenever the so-called companion process mimics the proper limiting distribution, which constitutes a simple and general check criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the former, the VAR bootstrap scheme becomes infeasible in panel data where the number of cross-sectional units is large and the dimension of the system is too high. With regard to the latter, Palm (1977) shows that any VAR model can be written as a system of ARMA equations for each unit; starting from this consideration and using the results of Kreiss et al (2011), Smeeks and Urbain (2011) describe the AR sieve bootstrap algorithm for panel data. Chang (2004) has proven the validity of the AR sieve bootstrap in the context of panel data if there is only one contemporaneous source of dependence between the units; however, this 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 3 condition is likely to be violated in many empirical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%