2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-014-0011-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the radiative properties of ice clouds: Light scattering, remote sensing, and radiation parameterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
110
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 230 publications
1
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radiative properties of cirrus clouds are governed not only by their optical thickness (COT) and ice crystal effective radius but also depend crucially on the ice crystal shape and orientation (Yi et al, 2013;Wendisch et al, 2007). Better knowledge of shape, surface roughness and orientation of ice crystals in cirrus clouds would therefore help to improve estimates of the radiative forcing of cirrus clouds as well as satellite retrievals of cirrus optical properties as discussed by Yang et al (2015) and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiative properties of cirrus clouds are governed not only by their optical thickness (COT) and ice crystal effective radius but also depend crucially on the ice crystal shape and orientation (Yi et al, 2013;Wendisch et al, 2007). Better knowledge of shape, surface roughness and orientation of ice crystals in cirrus clouds would therefore help to improve estimates of the radiative forcing of cirrus clouds as well as satellite retrievals of cirrus optical properties as discussed by Yang et al (2015) and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because they consist of ice particles with various microphysical characteristics, e.g. a wide range of habits and sizes Forster et al, 2007;Baran et al, 2007;Cole et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2015). Different ice particle habits have varying single-scattering characteristics, resulting in different radiative properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in reflected shortwave flux is at most about 7 W m 22 , assuming an area-averaged incident solar flux of 330 W m 22 , at least for the case considered here. These differences found for the g parameterizations are far less than the range in g found by several studies (Ulanowski et al 2006;Fu 2007;Garrett 2008;Baran 2012;van Diedenhoven et al 2014;Yang et al 2015). Indeed, in the case of Ulanowski et al (2006), experimentally derived g values were found to vary between 0.80 6 0.04 and 0.63 6 0.05 for smooth and rough ice analog rosettes, respectively, and this difference results in a shortwave flux uncertainty of about 256 W m 22 .…”
Section: The Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Typical TTL cirrus will efficiently trap outgoing longwave radiation from the surface and atmosphere, generally leading to a warming of the surface, and absorb incoming shortwave radiation at near-infrared wavelengths, generally leading to a local heating of the upper troposphere (Liou 1986;Liou 2005;Edwards et al 2007;Baran 2009;Taylor et al 2011;Baran 2012;Yi et al 2013;Zhou et al 2014;Hong and Liu 2015;Yang et al 2015;Hardiman et al 2015). The balance between cirrus warming or cooling the upper troposphere depends on its visible optical depth, as shown by Hong and Liu (2015), who demonstrated that cirrus with visible optical depths less than unity leads to a net heating of the upper troposphere, while optically thicker cirrus results in a net cooling of the upper troposphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation