On the Quantitative Doctrine of the Mean

Mintoff, Joe

doi:10.1111/sjp.12045

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We tend to assume that virtues and vices are contraries. 11 Cowardice is contrary to courage, gluttony to temperance, pride to humility, etc. This assumption is mistaken, according to Aristotle, for in fact the virtue is an intermediary between two extremes: one of excess, the other, of deficiency, i.e., lust and prudishness.…”

Section: Virtue As the Intermediary In The Nichomachean Ethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marginalized Vices, Virtue as Intermediary, and Ethical Generalizations: Recognizing the Particularity of Attaining Virtue

Romanyshyn

2018

The Heythrop Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following the work of MacIntyre, I call for a particularized approach to ethics. I do not base my argument on concrete situations, but rather, on the way virtue works. Following Aristotle's account, I contend that most people's conception of virtue, even abstracted from particular situations, misses something key: the ways of attaining virtue can be vastly different, and even diametrically opposed, for different people. This difference exists even without differences in external factors. People struggling with divergent vices will need to practice virtue in divergent ways. Therefore, I contend that we need to particularize the way we view the attainment of virtue, not just because each person is in a different situation or context, but because not every person approaches virtue from the same vice. I. INTRODUCTION: WHY PARTICULARIZE ETHICS?In Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity, MacIntyre advocates a particularized approach to ethics. He critiques vast generalizations often made in ethics, remarking that they overlook diverse cultural, personal, and circumstantial factors, which influence both what is ethical and how one might discover what is ethical. 1 He discusses various narratives of how a human being may flourish, adding, 'What I emphasized then were differences that result from the particularities of the different cultures in which those lives lived out.' He continues that the distinctive feature among different lives is the individuality of each agent's desires and practical reasoning. He says, 'For it is one of the characteristics of a good practical reasoner to be able to identify the relevant particularities of her or his situation, what it is on occasion about the situation that makes it difficult to apply generalizations and dangerous to rely on precedents.' 2 Ethics must be particular because what constitutes flourishing will vary widely from person to person.Similarly, Foucault observes that actions must be considered, not only in light of circumstances, but also in light of one's intentions and the end of the action. He prescribes reflection upon one's own actions and consideration of the ends relevant to those actions, offering the example, 'When we argue with someone it is in order to convey a truth to him. So if I find myself again in similar situations, I must recall these different ends so that from then on my actions will be adapted to them.' 3 Actions must be evaluated in light of their ends, as well as in light of their effect upon others in the proximity and additional circumstantial factors.Aristotle further validates particularity in ethics, because statements about more particular acts are truer than generalizations. While he recognizes the value of certain ethical V C 2018 Trustees for Roman Catholic Purposes Registered.

show abstract

Section: Virtue As the Intermediary In The Nichomachean Ethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marginalized Vices, Virtue as Intermediary, and Ethical Generalizations: Recognizing the Particularity of Attaining Virtue

Romanyshyn

2018

The Heythrop Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is worth emphasizing because the doctrine of the mean has received so much attention (in general) throughout the years. For some especially illuminating discussions of the doctrine (and defenses of it against different objections than the ones I consider here), see Hardie (1965), Brown (1997), and Mintoff (2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Yet, the targeting system example shows why Aristotle's doctrine is not so implausible after all. For more responses to Hursthouse, see Urmson (1973), Welton and Polansky (1995), Curzer (1996), Pearson (2006), Koehn (2012), and especially Mintoff (2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Defending the Doctrine of the Mean Against Counterexamples: A General Strategy

Colgrove

2024

Pacific Philosophical Qtr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aristotle's doctrine of the mean states that each moral virtue stands opposed to two types of vice: one of excess and one of deficiency, respectively. Critics claim that some virtues – like honesty, fair‐mindedness, and patience – are counterexamples to Aristotle's doctrine. Here, I develop a generalizable strategy to defend the doctrine of the mean against such counterexamples. I argue that not only is the doctrine of the mean defensible, but taking it seriously also allows us to gain substantial insight into particular virtues. Failure to take the doctrine seriously, moreover, exposes us to the risk of mistaking certain vices for virtues.

show abstract

“…For the latter see e.g. Marshall (1906) 37–8; Urmson (1973); Curzer (1996); Mintoff (2013). For partly qualitative interpretations see Burnet (1900) 73; Hursthouse (1980), (2006); Broadie (1991) 100; Gill (2012) 39.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

FOOLS RUSH IN: SEX, ‘THE MEAN’ AND EPICUREANISM IN HORACE,SATIRES1.2

Kemp

2016

Camb. class. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper concerns Horace's treatment of ‘the mean’ in Satires 1.2: his ironic demonstration of its elusiveness and changeability in the first part of the satire; and how this leads to the alignment of Epicurean moderation with a framework most associated with Aristotle. I argue that the irony in the sometimes apparently illogical, humorous expression of Peripatetic and Hellenistic ethics complements the satire's other ironic inconsistencies, while nevertheless serving a serious underlying philosophical purpose which some recent scholarship has denied.

show abstract

On the Quantitative Doctrine of the Mean

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

Marginalized Vices, Virtue as Intermediary, and Ethical Generalizations: Recognizing the Particularity of Attaining Virtue

Marginalized Vices, Virtue as Intermediary, and Ethical Generalizations: Recognizing the Particularity of Attaining Virtue

Defending the Doctrine of the Mean Against Counterexamples: A General Strategy

FOOLS RUSH IN: SEX, ‘THE MEAN’ AND EPICUREANISM IN HORACE,SATIRES1.2

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About