1979
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(79)90135-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the primitivity of prime rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show that the ideal P n is primitive, it is enough by [7] to prove that e(R/P n )e is a primitive ring. We construct an isomorphism between e(R/P n )e and the countably generated free algebra F z 0 , z 1 , .…”
Section: Monomial Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show that the ideal P n is primitive, it is enough by [7] to prove that e(R/P n )e is a primitive ring. We construct an isomorphism between e(R/P n )e and the countably generated free algebra F z 0 , z 1 , .…”
Section: Monomial Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using Theorems 3.10 and 4.2, we are able to characterize the primitive ideals of L K (E) in the next theorem. We also need the well-known fact (see [19], Theorem 1) that a not-necessarily unital ring R is right (left) primitive if and only if there is an idempotent a ∈ R such that aRa is a right (left) primitive ring. Proof.…”
Section: Primitive Ideals Of L K (E)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Leavitt path algebras were introduced in [1] and [9] as algebraic analogs of the C * -algebras ( [19]) and the study of their algebraic structure has been the subject of a series of papers in recent years (see, for e.g., [1] - [13], [15], [22]). In this paper we develop the theory of the prime ideals of the Leavitt path algebras L K (E) for an arbitrary sized graph E. Here the graph E is arbitrary in the sense that no restriction is placed either on the number of vertices in E or on the number of edges emitted by a single vertex in E (such as row-finite or countable).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is equivalent [4] It is known that if a polynomial ring R[x] is primitive then R need not be primitive [3] ( see also Bergman's example in [5]). Let R be a prime ring and I a nonzero ideal of R. Then R is a primitive ring if and only if I is a primitive ring [6]. Since the Hodges example has a nonzero Jacobson radical it follows that polynomial rings over Jacobson radical rings can be right and left primitive (see also Theorem 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%