2002
DOI: 10.11609/jott.zpj.17.11.939-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the prey of the Collared Scops Owl (Otus bakkamoena (Pennant)) at Auroville, Pondicherry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumption of reptiles by Spotted Owlets in Madurai was comparable to that documented for the species in India (Jadhav and Parasharya, 2003;Pande et al, 2007) and Pa�istan (Shah et al, 2004;Mahmood-ul-Hassan et al, 2007). Reptilian prey remains have also been commonly recorded in the food habits of other owl species in India (Verzhuts�ii and Ramanujam, 2002;Srinivasulu and Srinivasulu, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Consumption of reptiles by Spotted Owlets in Madurai was comparable to that documented for the species in India (Jadhav and Parasharya, 2003;Pande et al, 2007) and Pa�istan (Shah et al, 2004;Mahmood-ul-Hassan et al, 2007). Reptilian prey remains have also been commonly recorded in the food habits of other owl species in India (Verzhuts�ii and Ramanujam, 2002;Srinivasulu and Srinivasulu, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In India, dietary studies of owls had been sporadically conducted and studies on commoner species pertain to that of Spotted Owlet Athene brama (Kumar, 1985;Jadhav & Parasharya, 2003;Ramanujam & Verzhutskii, 2004), Eagle Owl Bubo bubo benghalensis (Ramanujam, 2000(Ramanujam, , 2001(Ramanujam, , 2004(Ramanujam, , 2006, Barn Owl Tyto alba (Kanakasabai et al, 1998;Neelanarayan et al, 1998;Neelanarayan & Kanakasabai, 2003) and Collared Scops Owl Otus bakkamoena (Verzhutskii & Ramanujam, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass was chosen as the principal measure of classification of prey as it has a more direct nutritional interpretation instead of quantitative measures (Reinecke 1979). The categories of particular components of food consumed were assessed according to a pre-established system in place for calculating trophic connections of owls in India pioneered by Kumar (1985) and followed by others (Verzhutskii & Ramanujam 2002;Ramanujam & Verzhutskii 2004;Ramanujam 2006). In this case, three classes were relevant: basic food -prey occurring with a frequency above 20%; constant food -prey occurring with a frequency between 5-20 %; and supplementary food -food occurring with a frequency between 1-5 %.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%