1985
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/32/4/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Photoabsorption Cross Section of Uranium Metal

Abstract: The total photoionization cross section for uranium has been calculated in the energy range 60-540 eV using a local-density based random phase approximation (LDRPA). The result is compared t o compilations of experimental photoabsorption data and is found to clear up a number of discrepancies between experiment and other calculations in the region between onset of 5d-and 4f-absorption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our measured optical constants for uranium are consistent with [8] and Cukier et al [9]. Also shown are optical constants for uranium determined by Henke et al [10] based on theoretical calculations [11][12][13]. the reflectance performance of a multilayer mirror coating created for the IMAGE satellite (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our measured optical constants for uranium are consistent with [8] and Cukier et al [9]. Also shown are optical constants for uranium determined by Henke et al [10] based on theoretical calculations [11][12][13]. the reflectance performance of a multilayer mirror coating created for the IMAGE satellite (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first time the optical constants of elemental uranium have been measured in this wavelength range. We find that the measured constants differ significantly from theoretical values [10][11][12][13] referenced on the Center for X-Ray Optics (CXRO) website [16]. The revised constants would have significantly aided in the design of the IMAGE mirror [1] and resolve discrepancies in the previous study between multilayer designs and the measured reflectance data [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The process could proceed as a 5d-5f absorption, followed by an autoionizing decay; or as a 5f-eg absorption, strongly modified by interchannel coupling with the 5d-5f transitions. Owing to the open f-subshell, there are a myriad of possible optically allowed 5d"5f final multiplets; the strength of the interactions between these multiplets makes the calculations very difficult because many-body effects are so important [6]. Furthermore, the fact that the experiment was performed on a solid, while the calculation was done for a free atom, could lead to some discrepancies.…”
Section: And the Compilation Of Henke [4] As Well As An Llnl Extensiomentioning
confidence: 99%