2004
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2004.160.727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the periods of motives with complex multiplication and a conjecture of Gross–Deligne

Abstract: We prove that the existence of an automorphism of finite order on a Q-variety X implies the existence of algebraic linear relations between the logarithm of certain periods of X and the logarithm of special values of the Γ-function. This implies that a slight variation of results by Anderson, Colmez and Gross on the periods of CM abelian varieties is valid for a larger class of CM motives. In particular, we prove a weak form of the period conjecture of Gross-Deligne [11, p. 205] 1 . Our proof relies on the ari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us emphasize that separating the periods coming from different degrees seems to be out of the reach of the methods used in this paper. Nevertheless, Theorem A implies the original Gross-Deligne conjecture in some interesting cases where H j (X , g ) vanishes in all degrees but one, as already observed by Maillot and Rössler [24,Cor. 4.2].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us emphasize that separating the periods coming from different degrees seems to be out of the reach of the methods used in this paper. Nevertheless, Theorem A implies the original Gross-Deligne conjecture in some interesting cases where H j (X , g ) vanishes in all degrees but one, as already observed by Maillot and Rössler [24,Cor. 4.2].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This paper pursues a series of works by Weil [37], Gross [19], Shimura [32], Deligne [13], Anderson [2], Colmez [8] and, more recently, Maillot and Rössler [24], aiming to understand the relations between periods of certain motives over Q and values of the gamma function at rational arguments. Recall that the latter is defined by the convergent integral Γ(z) = ∞ 0 t z−1 e −t d t for Re(z) > 0, and extended to a nowhere vanishing meromorphic function on the complex plane, with simple poles at z = 0, −1, −2, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important reason is that the equivariant R‐genus is closely related to the logarithmic derivative of certain L‐functions. Köhler–Roessler and Maillot–Roessler have shown in [25] and in [29] that the Faltings heights and the periods of C.M. abelian varieties can be expressed as a formula in terms of the special value of logarithmic derivative of L‐functions at 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the period conjecture, there is a result of Maillot-Roessler [17] using Arakelov theory on the absolute value of the period. Recently, Fresán [13] proved the formula for the alternating product of the determinants for any smooth projective variety with a finite order automorphism by reducing to a result of Saito-Terasoma [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%