2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11265-009-0405-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Performance Analysis of the Least Mean M-Estimate and Normalized Least Mean M-Estimate Algorithms with Gaussian Inputs and Additive Gaussian and Contaminated Gaussian Noises

Abstract: This paper studies the convergence analysis of the least mean M-estimate (LMM) and normalized least mean M-estimate (NLMM) algorithms with Gaussian inputs and additive Gaussian and contaminated Gaussian noises. These algorithms are based on the M-estimate cost function and employ error nonlinearity to achieve improved robustness in impulsive noise environment over their conventional LMS and NLMS counterparts. Using the Price's theorem and an extension of the method proposed in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can see that the computation of robust SPE and robust T 2 score in (31) and (32) only requires the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the tracked subspace, which is in contrast to their conventional counterparts in (8) and (10), respectively. Motivated by [32] and [38], the following robust recursive location and variance estimates for the robust SPE and robust T 2 score are proposed:…”
Section: Robust Recursive Detection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can see that the computation of robust SPE and robust T 2 score in (31) and (32) only requires the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the tracked subspace, which is in contrast to their conventional counterparts in (8) and (10), respectively. Motivated by [32] and [38], the following robust recursive location and variance estimates for the robust SPE and robust T 2 score are proposed:…”
Section: Robust Recursive Detection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Δ SPE (t) and Δ T 2 (t) are instantaneous deviations of the SP E(t) and T 2 (t) scores from their robust estimates defined in (37) and (38). Γ SPE and Γ T 2 are the threshold parameters chosen to control the degree of suppression of the faulty samples.…”
Section: E Robust Subspace Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] However, the performances of these filters are limited due to nonstationary nature of the PQ events and also the steady state error behavior during estimation. Stochastic gradient-based filtering algorithms like LMS and normalized LMS 3,4 have simpler structures, but the estimation accuracies are poor due to gradient noise amplification in case of time-varying and nonstationary disturbances. Though RLS has faster convergence, the estimation performance is limited due to an increase in computational complexity through calculation of matrix inversion lemma and a proper choice of forgetting factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a modified Huber function is incorporated into the conventional LPCR to remove samples that are detected as mislabeled observations using the logistic error. Though the concept of robust M-estimation based on automatic threshold selection (ATS) and the modified Huber function has been reported in [6] for robust estimation in linear systems, the incorporation of 2 T score, squared prediction error (SPE) and logistic error, and its application to non-linear LR is to our best knowledge new. Experimental results show that the proposed robust LPCR offers much better classification accuracy than the conventional LPCR in the presence of outliers, while the performance is also highly comparable under normal situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%