2019
DOI: 10.1002/int.22124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the orness of Bonferroni mean and its variants

Abstract: This article addresses orness measures to reflect the orlike degree of the Bonferroni mean (BM) and its variants. Some properties of these operators associated with their orness measures are portrayed analytically. However, the general orness measure involves the multiple integrals with the integral fold number being the number of the aggregated elements and as a result, the computation becomes complicated when the number of the aggregated elements is large. Furthermore, the analytical formula of the orness me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Dutta et al. (2019), the arithmetical average represent neutral attitude character, which can compensate the inferior performance on certain criteria through the superior criteria performance. The orness of this average aggregation is 0.5.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As noted by Dutta et al. (2019), the arithmetical average represent neutral attitude character, which can compensate the inferior performance on certain criteria through the superior criteria performance. The orness of this average aggregation is 0.5.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 96%
“…When p 1 = 10, p 2 = 10 for W NCGMSM (m,p 1 ,p 2 ) , the aggregation is compensated where the superior performance of alternatives on some criteria can balance the inferior performance on criteria. As noted by Dutta et al (2019), the arithmetical average represent neutral attitude character, which can compensate the inferior performance on certain criteria through the superior criteria performance. The orness of this average aggregation is 0.5.…”
Section: The Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nutshell, we can conclude that present ranking results are robust and not much sensitive to the parameters. Note that the exact estimation of the appropriate parameters associated with ELICITEBM could also be stem from the decision maker's perceived view towards aggregation process [22,46]. As we have emphasized on the fact that capturing the underlying interrelationship pattern in the aggregated ELICIT information is vital to make a reliable decision, it is worthy here to investigate the consequence if we do not consider the interrelationship in the information fusion process.…”
Section: Practical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%