Several extensions and generalizations of fuzzy sets have been introduced in the literature, for example, Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets, type 2 fuzzy sets, and fuzzy multisets. In this paper, we propose hesitant fuzzy sets. Although from a formal point of view, they can be seen as fuzzy multisets, we will show that their interpretation differs from the two existing approaches for fuzzy multisets. Because of this, together with their definition, we also introduce some basic operations. In addition, we also study their relationship with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. We prove that the envelope of the hesitant fuzzy sets is an intuitionistic fuzzy set. We prove also that the operations we propose are consistent with the ones of intuitionistic fuzzy sets when applied to the envelope of the hesitant fuzzy sets. C

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS) are a generalization of fuzzy sets where the membership is an interval. That is, membership, instead of being a single value, is an interval. A large number of operations have been defined for this type of fuzzy sets, and several applications have been developed in the last years.In this paper we describe hesitant fuzzy sets. They are another generalization of fuzzy sets. Although similar in intention to IFS, some basic differences on their interpretation and on their operators exist.In this paper we review their definition, the main results and we present an extension principle, which permits to generalize existing operations on fuzzy sets to this new type of fuzzy sets.We also discuss their use in decision making.

k-Anonymity is a useful concept to solve the tension between data utility and respondent privacy in individual data (microdata) protection. However, the generalization and suppression approach proposed in the literature to achieve k-anonymity is not equally suited for all types of attributes: (i) generalization/suppression is one of the few possibilities for nominal categorical attributes; (ii) it is just one possibility for ordinal categorical attributes which does not always preserve ordinality; (iii) and it is completely unsuitable for continuous attributes, as it causes them to lose their numerical meaning. Since attributes leading to disclosure (and thus needing kanonymization) may be nominal, ordinal and also continuous, it is important to devise k-anonymization procedures which preserve the semantics of each attribute type as much as possible. We propose in this paper to use categorical microaggregation as an alternative to generalization/suppression for nominal and ordinal k-anonymization; we also propose continuous microaggregation as the method for continuous k-anonymization.

No abstract